Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990909›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Building a synthesis of economic costs of biological invasions in New Zealand.

Thomas W Bodey, Zachary T Carter, Phillip J Haubrock, Ross N Cuthbert, Melissa J Welsh, Christophe Diagne, Franck Courchamp

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas W Bodey *School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Zachary T Carter *School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Phillip J HaubrockDepartment of River Ecology and Conservation, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany.
Ross N CuthbertGEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Melissa J WelshScion, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Christophe DiagneCNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Franck CourchampCNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions are a major component of anthropogenic environmental change, incurring substantial economic costs across all sectors of society and ecosystems. There have been recent syntheses of costs for a number of countries using the newly compiled InvaCost database, but New Zealand-a country renowned for its approach to invasive species management-has so far not been examined. Here we analyse reported economic damage and management costs incurred by biological invasions in New Zealand from 1968 to 2020. In total, US$69 billion (NZ$97 billion) is currently reported over this ∼50-year period, with approximately US$9 billion of this considered highly reliable, observed (

Indexed as

EcosystemIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsHealth ExpendituresNew ZealandPlantsBiosecurityEradicationInvaCostInvasive alien speciesIslandMonetary impactsResource damages and lossesSocioeconomic sectors

Identifiers

PMID35990909
PMCPMC9387519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.