Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990900›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Testing the effectiveness of

Sonia Trujillo-Argueta, Rafael F Del Castillo, Abril Velasco-Murguía

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sonia Trujillo-ArguetaCIIDIR Oaxaca, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Xoxocotlán, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Rafael F Del CastilloCIIDIR Oaxaca, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Xoxocotlán, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Abril Velasco-MurguíaCIIDIR Oaxaca, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Xoxocotlán, Oaxaca, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-barcoding is a species identification tool that uses a short section of the genome that provides a genetic signature of the species. The main advantage of this novel technique is that it requires a small sample of tissue from the tested organism. In most animal groups, this technique is very effective. However, in plants, the recommended standard markers, such as

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicPlantsAnimalsBayes TheoremDNAMexicoPhylogenyDNABayesian inference phylogenetic treeCBOLDNA-barcodingGenBankMaximum likelihood phylogenetic treeNeighbor joining phylogenetic treeNeotropicsQuercusSolanaceaeVascular plants

Identifiers

PMID35990900
PMCPMC9390329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.