ArticlePrecision clinical medicine2022
Precision management of brain oedema after acute ischaemic stroke.
Article in Precision clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroimaging predictors of malignant brain oedema after thrombectomy in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Automated Diffusion-Weighted MRI Analysis for Exploratory Risk Stratification of Malignant Cerebral Edema After Acute Ischemic Stroke.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hybrid machine learning for real-time prediction of edema trajectory in large middle cerebral artery stroke.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Development of a multimodal model combining radiomics and deep learning to predict malignant cerebral edema after endovascular thrombectomy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Inflammasome in Ischemic Stroke Pathogenesis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.