ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2022
The use of deep learning technology in dance movement generation.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing dance motion reconstruction using a two-dimensional matrix approach with hybrid genetic and fuzzy logic differential evolution.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Ethnic dance movement instruction guided by artificial intelligence and 3D convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The use of artificial intelligence-based Siamese neural network in personalized guidance for sports dance teaching.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- TFrontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dance generated by the traditional music action matching and statistical mapping models is less consistent with the music itself. Moreover, new dance movements cannot be generated. A dance movement generation algorithm based on deep learning is designed to extract the mapping between sound and motion features to solve these problems. First, the sound and motion features are extracted from music and dance videos, and then, the model is built. In addition, a generator module, a discriminator module, and a self-encoder module are added to make the dance movement smoother and consistent with the music. The Pix2PixHD model is used to transform the dance pose sequence into a real version of the dance. Finally, the experiment takes the dance video on the network as the training data and trained 5,000 times. About 80% of the dance data are used as the training set and 20% as the test set. The experimental results show that Train, Valid, and Test values based on the Generator+Discriminator+Autoencoder model are 15.36, 17.19, and 19.12, respectively. The similarity between the generated dance sequence and the real dance sequence is 0.063, which shows that the proposed model can generate a dance more in line with the music. Moreover, the generated dance posture is closer to the real dance posture. The discussion has certain reference value for intelligent dance teaching, game field, cross-modal generation, and exploring the relationship between audio-visual information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.