Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990875›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022

Midterm Outcomes After Revision Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Single-Bundle Transtibial Autograft.

Yi-Jou Chen, Cheng-Pang Yang, Chin-Shan Ho, Chun-Jui Weng, Alvin Chao-Yu Chen, Wei-Hsiu Hsu, Kuo-Yao Hsu, Yi-Sheng Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Triple Varus Knee: A Case Presentation.Video journal of sports medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yi-Jou ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan.
Cheng-Pang YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan.
Chin-Shan HoGraduate Institute of Sports Science, National Taiwan Sport University, Taoyuan.
Chun-Jui WengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan.
Alvin Chao-Yu ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan.
Wei-Hsiu HsuDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi.
Kuo-Yao HsuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan.
Yi-Sheng ChanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal technique for revision posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Purpose: To evaluate midterm outcomes after revision PCL reconstruction using a single-bundle transtibial autograft. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We reviewed 17 patients who underwent revision PCL reconstruction performed in our medical center by a single surgeon from 2003 to 2016. The cohort included 12 male and 5 female patients with a mean age of 31.3 years (range, 17-48 years). All of the patients underwent single-bundle transtibial reconstruction using the same surgical technique and were reviewed at a minimum of 4 years postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative posterior stress radiography was performed. The preoperative tibial slope and tibiofemoral angle were also measured. Preoperative and postoperative functional outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective scores as well as the Lysholm score. Results: The most common factor that contributed to the failure of primary surgery was misplaced tunnels, especially on the femoral side. There were 2 patients who had grade 2 laxity preoperatively, and 15 patients had grade 3 laxity preoperatively. At the latest follow-up, all 17 patients had grade 1 laxity. On posterior stress radiography, posterior displacement improved from 10.8 ± 2.1 mm preoperatively to 2.9 ± 1.1 mm at the latest follow-up ( Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, arthroscopic revision PCL reconstruction with a single-bundle transtibial autograft offered satisfactory outcomes at midterm follow-up.

Indexed as

failurekneePCLposterior cruciate ligamentrevisionsingle-bundletranstibial

Identifiers

PMID35990875
PMCPMC9382067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.