Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990824›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Efficacy and Safety of Modified Yupingfeng Nasal Spray in Controlling the Recurrence of Persistent and Moderate-Severe Allergic Rhinitis: Study Protocol for a Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, and Parallel-Arm Trial.

Ting Liu, Bing-Qing Lu, Dan-Dan Wang, Chao Liao, Han-Jen Chiang, Rong Zhang, Yuan Xi, Li Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ting LiuHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-9976
Bing-Qing LuHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8041-0805
Dan-Dan WangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9398-7542
Chao LiaoSchool of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5774-2369
Han-Jen ChiangHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6388-7193
Rong ZhangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3028-4529
Yuan XiSchool of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8198-9233
Li TianHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0537-061X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recurrent episode of allergic rhinitis (AR) is one of the leading illnesses that affects patients. However, there is little research evidence to support pharmacotherapy for AR recurrence. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in the control of the recurrence of AR. Methods: In this study, a multicenter, open-label, randomized, and parallel-arm trial will be conducted at three study centers. A total of 190 subjects aged 18-65 with persistent and moderate-severe AR (Qi deficiency and blood stasis syndrome) will be randomly assigned to receive the modified Yupingfeng nasal spray or mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray. When subjects' rhinitis control assessment test (RCAT) score is >21 for two weeks, they will stop taking the medication and enter the follow-up. Once a relapse occurs, the time point will be recorded, and the follow-up stops. The primary outcome is the six-month recurrence rate of AR after intervention withdrawal. The secondary outcomes are the one-month recurrence rate of AR, the RCAT score, the duration of follow-up, the duration of medication, the nasal endoscopic results, and questionnaires to evaluate symptoms, signs, and quality of life. The mechanism outcomes include some indicators that may be associated with AR recurrence. In addition, electrocardiograms and other safety indicators will be applied to evaluate the drug's safety.

Identifiers

PMID35990824
PMCPMC9385272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.