ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
Imaging Diagnosis of Primary Solitary Bone Neoplasts and Its Comparison with Tumor-like Lesions.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Imaging Diagnosis of Primary Solitary Bone Neoplasts and Its Comparison with Tumor-like Lesions.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-06Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the imaging diagnostic value of primary solitary bone tumor and tumor-like lesion of iliac crest. Methods: A total of 156 patients with primary solitary bone tumors and tumor-like lesions of the iliac bone treated in our hospital were selected, and the patients were diagnosed by X-ray, CT, and MRI. Sexual analysis of single diagnostic and combined diagnostic value was carried out. Results: Round high-density shadow, soft tissue mass shadow, soft tissue mass, right intestinal tube, and bladder obvious pressure were observed. The detection rates of giant cell tumor of bone, myeloma, osteochondroma, chondroma, eosinophilic granuloma, osteosarcoma, fibrous dysplasia, and Hodgkin lymphoma were 34.6%, 12.8%, 11.5%, 10.3%, 7.7%, 6.4%, 3.8%, and 2.6%, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 005); X-ray, CT, MR single diagnostic comparison, three methods joint diagnostic missed diagnosis rate and misdiagnosis rate, higher detection rate ( Conclusion: X-ray plays an important role in the diagnosis of primary solitary bone tumor and tumor-like lesion of iliac crest and is the first choice in clinical diagnosis. In the diagnosis of tumor disease, range, and soft tissue mass, MRI and CT diagnostic value can provide effective theoretical basis for patient clinical treatment. Therefore, the appropriate diagnostic method should be selected according to the specific situation of the patient, so that the efficiency of the clinical feature is improved.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.