Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990750›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse : research and treatment2022

Impact of an Accelerated Pretreatment Evaluation on Linkage-to-Care for Hepatitis C-infected Persons Who Inject Drugs.

Valérie Martel-Laferrière, Suzanne Brissette, Claire Wartelle-Bladou, Louis-Christophe Juteau, Maria Popa, Marie-Ève Goyer, Julie Bruneau

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse : research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02755402 (Impact of an Accelerated Pre-treatment Evaluation on Linkage-to-care and Linkage-to-treatment for HCV Infected Persons Who Inject Drugs), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02755402 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of an Accelerated Pre-treatment Evaluation on Linkage-to-care and Linkage-to-treatment for HCV Infected Persons Who Inject Drugs

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)Ran2017 to 2021Enrolled103ConditionsHepatitis C, Intravenous Drug UsersArmsXpert HCV Viral load, Transient elastography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valérie Martel-LaferrièreUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Suzanne BrissetteUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Claire Wartelle-BladouUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Louis-Christophe JuteauUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Maria PopaUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marie-Ève GoyerUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Julie BruneauUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Historically, hepatitis C virus (HCV) pretreatment evaluation has required multiple visits, frequently resulting in loss to follow-up and a delayed initiation of treatment. New technologies can accelerate this process. We investigated the feasibility of a single-day evaluation program and its impact on evaluation completion, treatment eligibility awareness, and treatment initiation among people who inject drugs (PWIDs). Methods: HCV-infected PWID who were unaware if they were eligible for treatment were recruited in a prospective evaluation of an accelerated model of care between 2017 and 2019 and compared to a historical cohort. The patients underwent a medical evaluation, rapid HCV viral load testing, and transient elastography during a single visit, at the end of which they were informed whether they were eligible for treatment. A historical cohort of patients fulfilling the same inclusion criteria and evaluated with the usual standard of care spanning several visits who were examined at the addiction medicine clinic from 2014 to 2016 served as the comparison group. Results: The accelerated and historical cohorts included 99 and 76 patients, respectively. The cohorts did not differ significantly by age and gender, but more patients in the historical cohort were undergoing opioid agonist therapy, while more patients in the accelerated cohort injected drugs in the last month. An accelerated evaluation resulted in a higher rate of evaluation completion (100% vs 67.1%; Conclusions: Accelerated evaluation enhanced the awareness of eligibility and reduced the time to initiation among eligible patients. Trial Registration: This study is registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02755402).

Indexed as

evaluationHepatitis Cperson who use drugstreatment

Identifiers

PMID35990750
PMCPMC9382068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.