ArticleJournal of environmental and public health2022
The Status Quo of College Students' Participation in English Online Learning in the Blended Learning Environment and the Ways to Improve It.
Article in Journal of environmental and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Structural Relationships among Academic Pressure, Independent Learning Ability, and Academic Self-Efficacy.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Article
- Retracted: The Status Quo of College Students' Participation in English Online Learning in the Blended Learning Environment and the Ways to Improve It.Journal of environmental and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-27Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/798CFDADE77B681EB89962A47C2D5E
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In college English teaching, online resources can meet students' self-study needs and show them a variety of English knowledge. Teachers should reasonably design teaching according to the characteristics of disciplines, and give students sufficient participation to conduct online self-study and online training. Therefore, online learning can make full use of students' spare time. In this paper, the current situation of college students' participation in online English learning and the ways to improve it are studied under the blended learning environment. The research shows that more than 88% of learners can finish online learning assignments on time. When the number of experiments reaches 60, 42.97% of them can finish online learning assignments on time, 29.51% of them can partially finish online learning assignments on time, and 21.94% of them cannot. In the process of online learning, autonomy and participation are high, and few of them are in a passive state, so they follow up online learning in time. The richness of college students' English online learning content under the blended learning environment provides a foundation, and college English teachers can optimize the learning content according to their lack of practical knowledge, which greatly improves college students' participation in online English learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.