Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990514›Full record

ReviewJournal of bone oncology2022

Separation surgery followed by stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: A systematic review and meta-analysis for local progression rate.

Dong-Ho Kang, Bong-Soon Chang, Hyoungmin Kim, Seong Hwa Hong, Sam Yeol Chang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bone oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evidence-based management of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC): expert recommendations for standardizing care in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dong-Ho KangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Bong-Soon ChangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyoungmin KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seong Hwa HongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sam Yeol ChangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal metastasis is the most common metastatic skeletal disease in cancer patients. Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), which occurs in 5-14% of cancer patients, is an oncological emergency because it may cause a permanent neurological deficit. Separation surgery followed by stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), so-called "hybrid therapy," has shown effectiveness in local control of spinal metastasis and has become an integral treatment option for patients with MESCC. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis to clarify the local progression rate of hybrid therapy and the risk factors for local progression. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to December 2021. Meta-analyses of proportions were used to analyze the data using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled 1-year local progression rate and confidence interval. Subgroup analyses were performed using meta-analyses of odds ratio (OR) for comparisons between groups. We also conducted a meta-regression analysis to identify the factors that caused heterogeneity. Results: A total of 661 patients from 13 studies (10 retrospective and 3 prospective) were included in the final meta-analysis. The quality of the included studies assessed using the Newcastle - Ottawa scale ranged from poor to fair (range, 4-6). The pooled local progression rate was 10.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 7.8-12.8 %; I Conclusions: The pooled 1-year local progression rate of hybrid therapy for MESCC was 10.2%. In subgroup and moderator analyses, a lower radiation dose per fraction, history of prior radiotherapy, and colorectal cancer showed a significant association with the 1-year local progression rate.

Indexed as

cEBRT, conventional external beam radiation therapyCT, computed tomographyCTV, clinical target volumeGTV, gross tumor volumeGy, GrayHybrid therapyLocal progressionMESCC, metastatic epidural spinal cord compressionMOOSE, Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyMRI, magnetic resonance imagingPRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesPTV, planning target volumeRadioresistanceSABR, stereotactic ablative radiotherapySeparation surgerySpinal metastasisStereotactic ablative radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35990514
PMCPMC9386097
OpenAlexW4289528683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.