ArticleCanadian liver journal2020
Adherence to quality indicators and hospital outcomes for patients with decompensated cirrhosis: An observational study.
Article in Canadian liver journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Quality indicators (QIs) exist for the care of patients with cirrhosis. We retrospectively examined the records of patients admitted to a large academic tertiary care centre for adherence to QIs and examined for an association between QI adherence and hospital outcomes. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of all patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis admitted to a large academic tertiary care centre over a 2-year period (2014-2016). Medical records of 522 patients were examined for 17 QIs related to inpatient cirrhosis care and adherence-judged using three different standards: 100% adherence, 70% adherence, or the QI score as a continuous variable. Linear and logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between QI score and length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, and inpatient mortality, respectively. Results: Adherence to QIs was variable (range 20%-95%). Overall, adherence to QIs relating to variceal bleeding was higher than adherence to indicators related to hepatic encephalopathy and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. There was weak evidence for a decreased odds of 30-day readmission when more QIs were met, regardless of the method used to quantify adherence (100% standard OR 0.53 [95% CI 0.26-1.09, Conclusions: Adherence to QIs related to inpatient care of decompensated cirrhosis may be associated with decreased 30-day readmissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.