ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2022
Frequency and Clinical Significance of Incidental Findings Detected in Internal Acoustic Canal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients with Audiovestibular Symptoms.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Neuroradiological Imaging in Progressive Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- An Evaluation of the Vestibular System in Individuals Aged 40-65 Years with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Retrocochlear pathology associated with audiovestibular symptoms is detected in very few of the patients, and most of the internal acoustic canal magnetic resonance imaging examinations (IAC-MRIs) are either completely normal or include accompanying incidental findings (IFs). The aim of our study is to reveal the presence and frequency of IFs in IAC-MRIs, together with retrocochlear lesions. In addition, we intend to emphasize the clinical importance of these IFs. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 374 serial IAC-MRI scans. Results: Gender distribution: 201 males and 173 females. Age range: 2-82 years. Seventy-two scans (19.25%) were totally normal. Fifteen scans (4.01%) demonstrated only pontocerebellar angle findings (PCAFs). The presence of PCAF and IF was together in 57 scans (15.24%). In 230 (61.50%) of the scans, only IFs were present. The incidence of IFs in all IAC-MRIs was 76.74% (287 of 374). Critical findings that may require clinical further evaluation and examination were present in 34 scans (9.09%). IFs that did not require further examination were observed in 253 scans (67.65%). Conclusion: Various IFs can be detected with IAC-MRI that may cause similar symptoms with PCAF. And unfortunately, some of these IFs may be of very high clinical importance. All referral clinicians should know well that these audiovestibular symptoms can appear as IFs anywhere in the auditory pathway, and how they should be followed in their clinical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.