Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990267›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Measurement of Canine Ataxic Gait Patterns Using Body-Worn Smartphone Sensor Data.

Daniel Engelsman, Tamara Sherif, Sebastian Meller, Friederike Twele, Itzik Klein, Anna Zamansky, Holger A Volk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel EngelsmanThe Hatter Department of Marine Technologies, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Tamara SherifDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hanover, Hanover, Germany.
Sebastian MellerDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hanover, Hanover, Germany.
Friederike TweleDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hanover, Hanover, Germany.
Itzik KleinThe Hatter Department of Marine Technologies, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Anna ZamanskyInformation Systems Department, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Holger A VolkDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hanover, Hanover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ataxia is an impairment of the coordination of movement or the interaction of associated muscles, accompanied by a disturbance of the gait pattern. Diagnosis of this clinical sign, and evaluation of its severity is usually done using subjective scales during neurological examination. In this exploratory study we investigated if inertial sensors in a smart phone (3 axes of accelerometer and 3 axes of gyroscope) can be used to detect ataxia. The setting involved inertial sensor data collected by smartphone placed on the dog's back while walking in a straight line. A total of 770 walking sessions were evaluated comparing the gait of 55 healthy dogs to the one of 23 dogs with ataxia. Different machine learning techniques were used with the K-nearest neighbors technique reaching 95% accuracy in discriminating between a healthy control group and ataxic dogs, indicating potential use for smartphone apps for canine ataxia diagnosis and monitoring of treatment effect.

Indexed as

ataxiacanisgait analysisinertial measurement unit (IMU)neurologysmartphone and IoT serviceswearable and mobile computing

Identifiers

PMID35990267
PMCPMC9386067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.