ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Predicting Hematoma Expansion after Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage Through a Radiomics Based Model.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Clinically Applicable Machine Learning Approach to Predict Intracerebral Hematoma Expansion.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Need for Transparency and Clinical Interpretability in Hemorrhagic Stroke Artificial Intelligence Research: Promoting Effective Clinical Application.Yonsei medical journal · 2024Article
- The clinical potential of radiomics to predict hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a narrative review.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is characterized as bleeding into the brain tissue, intracranial space, and ventricles and is the second most disabling form of stroke. Hematoma expansion (HE) following ICH has been correlated with significant neurological decline and death. For early detection of patients at risk, deep learning prediction models were developed to predict whether hematoma due to ICH will expand. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of HE prediction using a radiomic approach to help clinicians better stratify HE patients and tailor intensive therapies timely and effectively. Materials and Methods: Two hundred ICH patients with known hematoma evolution, were enrolled in this study. An open-source python package was utilized for the extraction of radiomic features from both non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans through characterization algorithms. A total of 99 radiomic features were extracted and different features were selected for network inputs for the NCCT and MR models. Seven supervised classifiers: Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor and Multilayer Perceptron were used to build the models. A training:testing split of 80:20 and 20 iterations of Monte Carlo cross validation were performed to prevent overfitting and assess the variability of the networks, respectively. The models were fed training datasets from which they learned to classify the data based on pre-determined radiomic categories. Results: The highest sensitivity among the NCCT classifier models was seen with the support vector machine (SVM) and logistic regression (LR) of 72 ± 0.3% and 73 ± 0.5%, respectively. The MRI classifier models had the highest sensitivity of 68 ± 0.5% and 72 ± 0.5% for the SVM and LR models, respectively. Conclusions: This study indicates that the NCCT radiomics model is a better predictor of HE and that SVM and LR classifiers are better predictors of HE due to their more cautious approach indicated by a higher sensitivity metric.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.