Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990180›Full record

ArticleStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction

Treatment of Unstable Elbow Injuries with a Hinged Elbow Fixator: Subjective and Objective Results.

Luigi Meccariello, Vincenzo Caiaffa, Konrad Mader, Ante Prkic, Denise Eygendaal, Michele Bisaccia, Giuseppe Pica, Sonia Utrilla-Hernando, Roberta Pica, Giuseppe Rollo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Luigi MeccarielloDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AORN San Pio Hospital, Benevento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3669-189X
Vincenzo CaiaffaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AORN San Pio Hospital, Benevento, Italy; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Di Venere Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Konrad MaderDivision Hand, Forearm and Elbow Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ante PrkicDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Denise EygendaalDepartment of Orthopaedics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michele BisacciaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Azienda Ospedaliera "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Perugia, Italy.
Giuseppe PicaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AORN San Pio Hospital, Benevento, Italy.
Sonia Utrilla-HernandoDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Toledo University Hospital, Toledo, Spain.
Roberta PicaDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopaedics Sciences University "La Sapienza", Piazzale Aldo Moro, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe RolloDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
University of Sannio · ITUniversität Hamburg · DEAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCTO Hospital · ITOspedale Vito Fazzi · ITProMedica Toledo Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Injuries around the elbow pose a challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. The complex bony architecture of the joint should be restored and the thin soft tissue envelope needs to be handled with meticulous care. Elbow instability is a complication seen after dislocations and fractures of the elbow and remains a treatment challenge. The purpose of this study was to provide subjective and objective results following the surgical treatment of unstable elbow dislocations with an external hinged fixation technique. Methods: Forty-six consecutive patients with complex trauma of the elbow with instability after ligament reconstruction were enrolled between January 2017 and December 2019. The parameters used to quantify the subjective and objective functional results were the Mayo Elbow Score (MES, objective) and Oxford Elbow Score (OES, subjective), and clinical stability of the elbow joint. We also performed a radiological follow-up of the fractures. Results: The mean MES and OES scores were good at the 12-month follow-up. We had 38 patients with stable joints and 8 patients with minor instability. Using the stress test, we saw a significant difference in the affected joint under varus stress (6.7 ± 1.8 mm) compared to the healthy joint (5.8 ± 1.2 mm) laterally. Furthermore, medially the gap was significantly larger (5.8 ± 0.8 mm, treated elbow) than the contralateral gap under valgus stress (4.3 ± 0.8 mm) ( Conclusion: The use of the hinged elbow external fixator in the treatment of complex elbow trauma is a valid therapeutic adjunct to ligamentous reconstruction showing encouraging results with acceptable complications. How to cite this article: Meccariello L, Caiaffa V, Mader K,

Indexed as

ComplicationsDislocationFractureHinged external fixatorInstabilityLigamentOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID35990180
PMCPMC9357797
OpenAlexW4288430653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.