ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Application of Mathematical Model Using Random Forest in Performance Appraisal Management of Cadres in Free Trade Zone.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Application of Mathematical Model Using Random Forest in Performance Appraisal Management of Cadres in Free Trade Zone.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-14Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/7C8B6A68CCB1A1C1D4203986D0A076
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve the efficiency of scientific assessment of cadre performance, first, this work analyzes the current situation of cadre performance appraisal in the free trade zone under the background of big data, and introduces the free trade zone and Random Forest (RF) algorithm. Second, based on the cadre evaluation index, this work establishes the cadre performance evaluation system of the free trade zone. Finally, the random forest algorithm model is implemented for the performance evaluation of cadres in the free trade zone. Additionally, the model's performance is verified with the actual data, including the acquisition of the best parameters and the most important indicators of the model and the performance comparison between the RF algorithm and other models. The results show that the performance of cadres in the free trade zone is finally divided into four grades: medium, good, qualified, and excellent. There are obvious grade differences in the performance of cadres in the free trade zone. Partly because some qualified cadres lack a strong sense of competition and professional competence, do not publicize the work of cadres in the free trade zone, and do not communicate with the masses in time. In the data processing, 18 missing experimental data were supplemented, and the best model parameters were obtained as follows: NTree = 200, MTry = 1. The most important indicators of cadre performance evaluation are the construction of a clean and honest government, the ability to act in accordance with the law and the professional ability. The accuracy of the RF algorithm obtained here is 71.4%. The prediction accuracy of the RF algorithm for the overall sample, training sample, and test sample is 94%, 96%, and 86%, respectively, which are higher than those of other common models. A RF algorithm with good classification effect is obtained and this work provides a reference for the scientific management of cadre performance appraisal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.