ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Evaluation of Ideological and Political Education under Deep Learning Neural Network.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Evaluation of Ideological and Political Education under Deep Learning Neural Network.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-04Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Under the background of the rapid development of the new generation of information technology, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have made some progress in the evaluation research of various courses in colleges and universities. However, there is little research on the application of ANNs in Ideological and Political Education (IPE) courses. Based on this, this work attempts to introduce the Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) into the evaluation system of IPE courses. Firstly, the structure and characteristics of the BPNN are given, and it is optimized by the genetic algorithm based on its characteristics. Secondly, the theoretical framework of IPE course evaluation is established, and the corresponding evaluation model is constructed using the optimized BPNN. Finally, a questionnaire survey is designed to analyze the current situation of IPE evaluation in colleges and universities, and a simulation experiment is set up to test the BPNN evaluation model before and after optimization. The results are as follows. First, there are mainly five evaluation methods for IPE courses in Chinese colleges and universities: 6/4, 3/7, 2/2/6, 5/5, and 3/3/4. Second, the training error value of the BPNN model is in the interval (-2.3, 2.2), and when the number of cycles is 552, the error is infinitely close to zero. Thirdly, the training error value of the optimized BPNN model is in the interval (-0.22, 1.2), and when the number of cycles is 775, the error is infinitely close to zero. Fourthly, the error between the output value of the optimized BPNN model and the expert score value is generally smaller than the error value before optimization. This work aims to provide a theoretical reference for the further application of neural network technology in the evaluation of IPE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.