Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990108›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Artificial intelligence-aided diagnosis model for acute respiratory distress syndrome combining clinical data and chest radiographs.

Kai-Chih Pai, Wen-Cheng Chao, Yu-Len Huang, Ruey-Kai Sheu, Lun-Chi Chen, Min-Shian Wang, Shau-Hung Lin, Yu-Yi Yu, Chieh-Liang Wu, Ming-Cheng Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Multimodal Deep Learning for ARDS Detection.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Imaging the Lung in ARDS: A Primer.Respiratory care · 2024
    Review
  10. Ten misconceptions regarding decision-making in critical care.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Lung Imaging and Artificial Intelligence in ARDS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kai-Chih PaiCollege of Engineering, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4379-1186
Wen-Cheng ChaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yu-Len HuangDepartment of Computer Science, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ruey-Kai SheuDepartment of Computer Science, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Lun-Chi ChenCollege of Engineering, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Min-Shian WangArtificial Intelligence Studio, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shau-Hung LinDDS-THU Artificial Intelligence Center, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yu-Yi YuDivision of Critical Care and Respiratory Therapy, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chieh-Liang WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ming-Cheng ChanCollege of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop an artificial intelligence-based model to detect the presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) using clinical data and chest X-ray (CXR) data. Method: The transfer learning method was used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) model with an external image dataset to extract the image features. Then, the last layer of the model was fine-tuned to determine the probability of ARDS. The clinical data were trained using three machine learning algorithms-eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR)-to estimate the probability of ARDS. Finally, ensemble-weighted methods were proposed that combined the image model and the clinical data model to estimate the probability of ARDS. An analysis of the importance of clinical features was performed to explore the most important features in detecting ARDS. A gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) model was used to explain what our CNN sees and understands when making a decision. Results: The proposed ensemble-weighted methods improved the performances of the ARDS classifiers (XGB + CNN, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.916; RF + CNN, AUC = 0.920; LR + CNN, AUC = 0.920; XGB + RF + LR + CNN, AUC = 0.925). In addition, the ML model using clinical data to present the top 15 important features to identify the risk factors of ARDS. Conclusion: This study developed combined machine learning models with clinical data and CXR images to detect ARDS. According to the results of the Shapley Additive exPlanations values and the Grad-CAM techniques, an explicable ARDS diagnosis model is suitable for a real-life scenario.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndromeartificial intelligencechest X-rayclinical dataensemble-weighted modelmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35990108
PMCPMC9386858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.