Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990100›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Microsurgery for intracranial aneurysms: A qualitative survey on technical challenges and technological solutions.

W R Muirhead, H Layard Horsfall, D Z Khan, C Koh, P J Grover, A K Toma, P Castanho, D Stoyanov, H J Marcus, M Murphy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. [Association between early stenosis and temporary clipping in treated cerebral aneurysms].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

W R MuirheadDepartment of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
H Layard HorsfallDepartment of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
D Z KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
C KohDepartment of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
P J GroverDepartment of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
A K TomaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
P CastanhoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
D StoyanovThe Wellcome Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
H J MarcusDepartment of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
M MurphyDepartment of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Microsurgery for the clipping of intracranial aneurysms remains a technically challenging and high-risk area of neurosurgery. We aimed to describe the technical challenges of aneurysm surgery, and the scope for technological innovations to overcome these barriers from the perspective of practising neurovascular surgeons. Materials and Methods: Consultant neurovascular surgeons and members of the British Neurovascular Group (BNVG) were electronically invited to participate in an online survey regarding surgery for both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. The free text survey asked three questions: what do they consider to be the principal technical barriers to aneurysm clipping? What technological advances have previously contributed to improving the safety and efficacy of aneurysm clipping? What technological advances do they anticipate improving the safety and efficacy of aneurysm clipping in the future? A qualitative synthesis of responses was performed using multi-rater emergent thematic analysis. Results: The most significant reported historical advances in aneurysm surgery fell into five themes: (1) optimising clip placement, (2) minimising brain retraction, (3) tissue handling, (4) visualisation and orientation, and (5) management of intraoperative rupture. The most frequently reported innovation by far was indocyanine green angiography (84% of respondents). The three most commonly cited future advances were hybrid surgical and endovascular techniques, advances in intraoperative imaging, and patient-specific simulation and planning. Conclusions: While some surgeons perceive that the rate of innovation in aneurysm clipping has been dwarfed in recent years by endovascular techniques, surgeons surveyed highlighted a broad range of future technologies that have the potential to continue to improve the safety of aneurysm surgery in the future.

Indexed as

aneurysm clippingmicrosurgerysubarachnoid haemorrhagesurveytechnology

Identifiers

PMID35990100
PMCPMC9386123
OpenAlexW4289731267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.