Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35990012›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2022

Feasibility and validity of ecological momentary cognitive testing among older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Raeanne C Moore, Robert A Ackerman, Madisen T Russell, Laura M Campbell, Colin A Depp, Philip D Harvey, Amy E Pinkham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Technology-natives and technology-adopters: Age differences in remote cognitive assessment in Alzheimer disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Visual Working Memory in Older Adults With and Without Early-Onset Depression: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Digital Neuropsychology beyond Computerized Cognitive Assessment: Applications of Novel Digital Technologies.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raeanne C MooreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Robert A AckermanDepartment of Psychology, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Madisen T RussellDepartment of Psychology, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Laura M CampbellSan Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, United States.
Colin A DeppDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Philip D HarveyPsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Amy E PinkhamDepartment of Psychology, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USBruce W. Carter VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Introspective Accuracy, Bias, and Everyday Functioning in Severe Mental IllnessR01MH112620 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI PINKHAM, AMY · 2018 to 2021
$3.2M
Brain Morphology, Inflammation and Episodic Memory Profiles Among Persons Aging with HIVF31AG067869 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CAMPBELL, LAURA MICHELLE · 2020 to 2021
$78k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG067869NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is critical to intervene early in the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage of the Alzheimer's disease trajectory, but traditional cognitive testing methods are costly, burdensome, and difficult to access. We examined adherence and validity data to a 30-day self-administered ecological momentary cognitive testing protocol among a sample of older adults with MCI and cognitively normal controls to evaluate feasibility, tolerability, and initial validity in comparison to standard neuropsychological tests. Participants included 48 participants with MCI (Mean age = 72 years, SD = 7 years) and 46 demographically-matched cognitively normal (NC) control participants (Mean age = 70 years, SD = 7 years). Participants completed traditional neuropsychological testing to determine MCI status, followed by 30 days of remote ecological momentary cognitive testing. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys were administered 3 times per day for 30 days (possible total = 90), and mobile cognitive tests were administered every other day (for a total of 15 administrations). Mobile cognitive tests included the Variable Difficulty List Memory Test (VLMT; measure of learning and memory), Memory Matrix (measure of visual working memory), and the Color Trick Test (measure of executive function). EMA and mobile cognitive test adherence, fatigue effects, mobile cognitive test performance and group differences, and psychometrics (reliability, convergent validity, ceiling effects, and practice effects) were examined. Overall mean-level adherence to the mobile cognitive tests was 85% and did not differ by MCI status. The reliability of stable between-person individual differences for the VLMT and Memory Matrix were very high. Moreover, although the reliability of within-person change for Memory Matrix was adequate, the corresponding reliability for VLMT was somewhat low. Averaged performance on the mobile cognitive tests was correlated with lab-based tests measuring the same construct. Participants with MCI performed worse than NCs on the VLMT and Color Trick Test, and there was no evidence of fatigue effects for these two tests. These findings support the feasibility and potential for ecological momentary cognitive testing to support clinical trials and for measuring cognitive changes over time in persons with increased risk for Alzheimer's disease such as those with MCI.

Indexed as

adherenceAlzheimer's diseaseambulatory assessmentecological momentary assessmentpsychometricssmartphones

Identifiers

PMID35990012
PMCPMC9390883
OpenAlexW4289866422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.