Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35989864›Full record

ArticleLearning and individual differences2022

Stress development during emergency remote teaching in higher education.

Ramona Obermeier, Michaela Gläser-Zikuda, Svenja Bedenlier, Rudolf Kammerl, Bärbel Kopp, Albert Ziegler, Marion Händel

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Learning and individual differences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trajectories of postoperative nutritional risk changes in patients with oesophageal cancer and their relationship with symptom recovery-a multicentre longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Remote Learning in Higher Education: Evidence from Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ramona ObermeierLinz School of Education, Department for Educational Research, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
Michaela Gläser-ZikudaDepartment of Education, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Svenja BedenlierThe Innovation in Learning Institute (ILI), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Rudolf KammerlDepartment of Education, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Bärbel KoppDepartment of Education, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Albert ZieglerDepartment of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Marion HändelDepartment of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Higher education includes e-learning in addition to on-site learning. Still, the shift to Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) as reaction to the Covid-19 pandemic in the summer semester 2020, presented a challenging situation for students. Cross-sectional studies pointed towards higher stress levels of students. However, only a few studies addressed the development of students' stress across several dimensions (joy, worry, tension, demands) within one semester. The current study analyzed trajectories of stress in ERT in relation to age, gender, digital readiness, and experience of loneliness, based on a sample of

Indexed as

Digital readinessEmergency remote teachingHigher educationPerceived stressSocial embeddedness

Identifiers

PMID35989864
PMCPMC9376880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.