Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35989835›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Looking for a Silver Lining to the Dark Cloud: A Google Trends Analysis of Contraceptive Interest in the United States Post Roe vs. Wade Verdict.

Priyankar K Datta, Sumit R Chowdhury, Ajisha Aravindan, Sayan Nath, Parijat Sen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Post-Vasectomy Semen Analysis: What's All the Fuss about?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. The landscape of male contraception A narrative review.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development ofPEC innovation · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Priyankar K DattaAnaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Sumit R ChowdhuryNeuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Ajisha AravindanAnaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Sayan NathCritical Care Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.
Parijat SenPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
University of Kentucky · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background In the wake of the recent Roe vs. Wade judgment, we performed a Google Trends analysis to identify the impact of this decision on the interests regarding contraceptive choices in the United States. Methods A Google Trends search between April 6 and July 5, 2022, with the United States as the area of interest, was performed using the five most popular contraception choices. In addition, a second trend search was performed using oral and injectable hormonal birth control measures. Results Trends showed a spike in interest regarding various contraceptive methods immediately following the verdict. The highest increase in interest was noted for "vasectomy," followed by "tubal ligation." With respect to oral and injectable birth control measures, "morning after pill" showed a marked spike in interest. Conclusion This verdict has triggered increased interest in contraceptive practices, which can be translated into better reproductive health with proper public health initiatives.

Indexed as

abortioncontraceptionfemale reproductive healthhuman rightspolicy makingpregnancypublic healthsexual and reproductive health rights

Identifiers

PMID35989835
PMCPMC9386304
OpenAlexW4285797503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.