ArticleCureus2022
COVID-19 and Ventricular Shunt Revisions.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- National trends in hydrocephalus mortality in the United States, 1999-2024: a serial cross-sectional (ecological) trend analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCOVID-19 patients frequently experience headaches, malaise, and fatigue. For patients with shunted hydrocephalus, these signs and symptoms can often be indicative of shunt failure. Thus, it can be challenging to determine if shunt failure has occurred in this patient population. Therefore, we explored the question of how a diagnosis of COVID-19 in shunted hydrocephalus patients influences the rate of shunt revision.
methodsWe used a deidentified database network (TriNetX) to gather information on patients with shunted hydrocephalus and COVID-19 versus no COVID-19 from January 20, 2020, through September 26, 2021. Our primary outcome of interest was shunt revision at 90 days, with secondary outcomes of mortality, hospitalization, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, PEG tube placement, fall, seizure, acute kidney injury (AKI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), ischemic stroke (I.S.), myocardial infarction (MI), and sepsis. Cohorts were propensity score-matched for common comorbidities and demographics.
resultsAfter propensity score matching, 10,600 patients with shunted hydrocephalus and COVID-19 (cohort 1) and 10,600 patients with shunted hydrocephalus and no COVID-19 (cohort 2) were identified. Average age was 38.5 years. Eight hundred and thirty-four patients (7.869%) in cohort 1 and 180 (1.698%) patients in cohort 2 underwent shunt revision (p=<0.0001, OR 4.978, 95% CI 4.198, 5.821). Mortality was 4.642% vs. 2.113% (p<0.0001, OR 2.255, 95% CI 1.921, 2.647). Hospitalization rates were 27.72% vs. 10.303% (p<0.0001), and ICU admission rates 11.567% vs. 3.463% (p<0.0001). Ventilator dependence was 3.529% vs. 0.953% (p<0.0001), tracheostomy 1.142% vs. 0.236% (p<0.0001), PEG tube insertion 2.472% vs. 0.585% (p<0.0001), falls 2.321% vs. 1.076% (p<0.0001), seizure 11.369% vs. 5.953% (p<0.0001), AKI 4.416% vs. 1.717% (p<0.0001), VTE 3.538% vs. 1.293% (p<0.0001), sepsis 3.887% vs. 1.179% (p<0.0001), IS 0.585% vs. 0.16% (p<0.0001), and MI 1.34% vs. 0.519% (p<0.0001).
conclusionCOVID-19 infection is associated with an almost five-fold increase in shunt revisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.