ArticleNeurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms2022
The rat Lux Actuating Search Task (LAST) and effects of sleep deprivation on task reversal performance.
Article in Neurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Image discrimination reversal learning is impaired by sleep deprivation in rats: Cognitive rigidity or fatigue?Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep deprivation (SD) causes significant deficits in multiple aspects of cognition, including sustained attention and working memory. Investigating the neural processes underpinning these cognitive losses has proven challenging due to the confounds of current animal tasks; many employ appetitive or aversive stimuli to motivate behavior, while others lack task complexity that translates to human studies of executive function. We established the Lux Actuating Search Task (LAST) to circumvent these issues. The LAST is performed in a circular, open-field arena that requires rats to find an unmarked, quasi-randomly positioned target. Constant low-level floor vibrations motivate ambulation, while light intensity (determined by the rodent's proximity to the target destination) provides continuous visual feedback. The task has two paradigms that differ based on the relationship between the light intensity and target proximity: the Low Lux Target (LLT) paradigm and the High Lux Target paradigm (HLT). In this study, on days 1-6, the rats completed nine trials per day on one of the two paradigms. On day 7, the rats were either sleep deprived by gentle handling or were left undisturbed before undertaking the opposite (reversal) paradigm on days 7-9. Our results showed that SD significantly impeded the ability of Long Evans rats to learn the reversal paradigm, as indicated by increased times to target and increased failure percentages compared to rats whose sleep was undisturbed. Rats also showed reduced learning with the HLT paradigm, as the initial task or as the reversal task, likely due to the rodents' photophobia limiting their motivation to navigate toward a bright light, which is required to succeed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.