ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2022
Sex differences in the mouse photothrombotic stroke model investigated with X-ray fluorescence microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic imaging.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photothrombotic and middle cerebral artery occlusion models produce distinct neurovascular injury and sex-dependent outcomes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hemodynamic and Electrophysiological Progression of the Rose Bengal Photothrombotic Stroke Model in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- A minimally invasive, scalable and reproducible neonatal rat model of severe focal brain injury.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Increased sensitivity in detection of deficits following two commonly used animal models of stroke.Behavioural brain research · 2024Article
- NSC-derived exosomes enhance therapeutic effects of NSC transplantation on cerebral ischemia in mice.eLife · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability around the world. To date, the majority of pre-clinical research has been performed using male lab animals and results are commonly generalized to both sexes. In clinical stoke cases females have a higher incidence of ischemic stroke and poorer outcomes, compared to males. Best practices for improving translatability of findings for stroke, encourage the use of both sexes in studies. Since estrogen and progesterone have recognized neuroprotective effects, it is important to compare the size, severity and biochemical composition of the brain tissue following stroke in female and male animal models. In this study a photothrombotic focal stroke was induced in male and female mice. Vaginal secretions were collected twice daily to track the stage of estrous. Mice were euthanized at 24 h post-stroke. Histological staining, Fourier transform infrared imaging and X-ray fluorescence imaging were performed to better define the size and metabolic markers in the infarct core and surrounding penumbra. Our results show while the female mice had a significantly lower body mass than males, the cross-sectional area of the brain and the size of infarct and penumbra were not significantly different between the groups. In addition to the general expected sex-linked differences of altered NADH levels between males and females, estrus females had significantly elevated glycogen in the penumbra compared with males and total phosphorus levels were noted to be higher in the penumbra of estrus females. Elevated glycogen reserves in the tissue bordering the infarct core in females may present alternatives for improved functional recovery in females in the early post-stroke phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.