What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Dietary supplementation with raw potato starch enhanced tibia mass of meat ducks potentially linked to intestine-derived inflammation.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
   Article
2. Dietary supplementation with raw potato starch reversed enteritis-induced bone loss via Malt1 paracaspase inhibition in meat ducks.Poultry science · 2026
   Article
3. Bacillus-based probiotics and fermented products as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry: Current perspectives.Poultry science · 2026
   Review
4. Effects ofVeterinary sciences · 2024
   Article
5. Establishment of an Enteric Inflammation Model in Broiler Chickens by Oral Administration with Dextran Sulfate Sodium.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as