Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35989691›Full record

ArticleThe journal of poultry science2022

The Application of Copper Waterline on Laying Performance and Gut Health of Aged Laying Hens.

Ning Ma, Min Liu, Mengze Song, Sheng Li, Xiaoyan Lin, Hongchao Jiao, Xiaojuan Wang, Jingpeng Zhao, Shuhong Sun, Hai Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of poultry science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ning MaShandong Agricultural University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, No. 61 Daizong Street, Taian City, Shandong Province, 271018, China.
Min LiuShandong Agricultural University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, No. 61 Daizong Street, Taian City, Shandong Province, 271018, China.
Mengze SongShandong Agricultural University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, No. 61 Daizong Street, Taian City, Shandong Province, 271018, China.
Sheng LiShandong Agricultural University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, No. 61 Daizong Street, Taian City, Shandong Province, 271018, China.
Xiaoyan LinShandong Agricultural University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, No. 61 Daizong Street, Taian City, Shandong Province, 271018, China.
Hongchao JiaoShandong Agricultural University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, No. 61 Daizong Street, Taian City, Shandong Province, 271018, China.
Xiaojuan WangShandong Agricultural University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, No. 61 Daizong Street, Taian City, Shandong Province, 271018, China.
Jingpeng ZhaoShandong Agricultural University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, No. 61 Daizong Street, Taian City, Shandong Province, 271018, China.
Shuhong SunShandong Agricultural University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, No. 61 Daizong Street, Taian City, Shandong Province, 271018, China.
Hai LinShandong Agricultural University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, No. 61 Daizong Street, Taian City, Shandong Province, 271018, China.
Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNShandong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of the application of copper waterline on the performance and gut health of aged laying hens was evaluated in this study. Forty-eight 70-week-old laying hens were divided into two groups (three replicates of eight hens each): control and copper (Cu) groups provided with normal polyvinyl chloride (PVC) waterline or Cu waterline. The laying performance was measured during the four-week period of the experiment. The intestinal antioxidant status and the microbiota diversity of the cecal content were determined. Moreover, a bacteriostasis test on

Indexed as

antibacterial activityantioxidant capacitycopper waterlinelaying hensmicrobial diversity

Identifiers

PMID35989691
PMCPMC9346600
OpenAlexW4214649692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.