Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35989672›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2022

Nursing skills required across natural and man-made disasters: A scoping review.

Ya Su, Xi Vivien Wu, Natsuka Ogawa, Michiko Yuki, Yun Hu, Yan Yang

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. What Are the Best Practices for Nursing Care during an Earthquake? A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Problems and Suggested Solutions of Advanced Practice Nursing in Disaster Events].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ya SuShanghai Jiao Tong University School of Nursing, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3739-3587
Xi Vivien WuAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9264-3630
Natsuka OgawaGraduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.
Michiko YukiFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-4545
Yun HuShanghai Jiao Tong University School of Nursing, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2325-409X
Yan YangShanghai Jiao Tong University School of Nursing, Shanghai, China.

Funding

This research was supported by the Construction of emergency plan system for public health emergencies and emergency response "reserve team" GWV-5.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo map the nursing skills required for different types of disasters.

designThis was a scoping review of research studies conducted between July and August 2021. We conducted a systematic literature search of nine electronic databases from inception till July 2021, and an updated search was done in April 2022. This review is based on the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley (2005), which was further refined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. DATA SOURCES: A range of electronic databases was searched systematically, including CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and Ichushi-Web. Articles published in Chinese, English and Japanese were selected for the review. REVIEW

methodsThe PCC model was used to frame the inclusion criteria. Studies were screened, appraised and extracted by two reviewers, and the study findings were narratively synthesized.

resultsWe identified nursing skills for five types of natural disasters including (1) earthquakes, (2) typhoons, (3) tsunamis, (4) marine disasters and (5) infectious diseases and three man-made disasters: (1) radiation disasters, (2) bioterrorism and (3) war. Among these, there are five types of common professional skills nurses are required to possess including casualty triage, observation and monitoring, basic first aid techniques, psychological care and communication skills. In addition, it was shown that different disasters require different specific professional skills.

conclusionThis scoping review explored the disaster nursing skills required for eight types of disasters and provides evidence for future education and training. Further research is needed to build more accurate scenario-based simulation training programs to provide more insights into future disaster precision nursing. IMPACT: This scoping review provides evidence for future education and training in disaster nursing to improve nurses' knowledge and competencies in dealing with the different types of disaster situations.

Indexed as

DisastersEarthquakesNursesClinical CompetenceHumansTriagedisasterdisaster nursingnursenursing skillscoping review

Identifiers

PMID35989672
PMCPMC9543669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.