Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35989494›Full record

ReviewHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2022

Using experiential learning and authentic assessments to support students to become competent health promotion practitioners.

Karen Anderson, Sabrina Gupta, Fernanda Nava Buenfil, Glenda Verrinder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Using experiential learning and authentic assessments to support students to become competent health promotion practitioners.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen AndersonDepartment of Community and Allied Health, Violet Vines Centre for Rural Health Research, La Trobe Rural Health School, Bendigo, Vic., Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6595-118X
Sabrina GuptaSchool of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3793-1584
Fernanda Nava BuenfilSchool of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5338-7243
Glenda VerrinderDepartment of Community and Allied Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, Bendigo, Vic., Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2447-9429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

titleUsing experiential learning and authentic assessments to support students to become competent health promotion practitioners. ISSUE ADDRESSED: The aim of this article is to describe how experiential learning, authentic assessments, community development and ethical principles were consolidated in the design and delivery of a health promotion planning and evaluation subject (HPE) during 2019 to 2021. Experiential learning and authentic assessments were used to guide the development of health promotion competencies in line with the International Union for Health Promotion and Education (IUHPE) Core Competencies and Professional Standards for Health Promotion. Students were required to complete three sequential authentic assessments. Ethics approval was granted for students to undertake a needs/assets assessment with a local community group following which, students completed a literature review and planned a community development program.

methodsThe subject comprises 10 h of weekly engagement over a 12-week semester with weekly topics following a program logic model. Working in teams and individually, students work with a local community group to assess their needs/assets and establish priority areas regarding health and wellbeing. This then informed the development of a health promotion program and evaluation plan. Students undertook three sequential authentic assessment tasks: (i) needs/assets report, (ii) a literature review and (iii) a program folio. Retrospective anonymous student feedback on subject (SFS) data from 2019 to 2021 was used to evaluate HPE. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: HPE provides students with the opportunity to understand ethical principles and processes, engage with stakeholders in the community and develop qualitative research skills, to plan and evaluate health promotion programs. SFS scores have improved with an overall score of 3.7 (response rate 49.44%) in 2019 to 4.3 (response rate 39.58%) in 2020 and 4.04 (response rate 28.57%) in 2021.

conclusionStudents acquire a broad range of knowledge and skills in line with IUHPE Core Competency and Professional Standards for Health Promotion preparing them for their future professional practice. SO WHAT?: These teaching and learning experiences show that students can develop health promotion competencies through sound pedagogical approaches, both online and face-to-face and in challenging environments.

Indexed as

Problem-Based LearningStudentsCurriculumHealth PromotionHumansLearningRetrospective Studiescurriculumeducational techniqueshealth promotionhealth promotion competencieshigher educationneeds assessmentpedagogy

Identifiers

PMID35989494
PMCPMC9825918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.