ArticleJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging2022
A uniformity correction method to reduce scan time for 7T sodium imaging of brain tumors.
Article in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeSodium imaging shows great potential for the characterization of brain tumors. Intensity correction is required but the additional scan time is costly. Recent developments can halve the time but were optimized in normal brains and may not be applicable in brain tumor imaging. We aim to develop an individualized uniformity correction for sodium imaging optimized for brain tumor patients that reduces scan time but provides high-resolution images for clinical practice.
methodsTwo-, 4-, and 6-mm iso-cubic voxel resolution birdcage coil images were used to calculate the 2-mm iso-cubic voxel individual sensitivity maps in healthy subjects (n = 3). Cut profiles were compared to determine the optimal approach. In addition, a 3-dimensional phantom was developed to test a generalized uniformity correction approach in both healthy subjects (n = 3) and tumor patients (n = 3).
resultsThe cut profiles showed that the average correlation coefficient between 2- and 4-mm birdcage image correction results was r = .9937, and r = .9876 for 2- and 6-mm birdcage images. The correlation result between individual map correction and phantom map correction was r = .9817.
conclusionThe 4 mm birdcage coil image provided the optimal approach for both as a compromise between the time-savings effect and image quality. This method allows for a 2-mm iso-cubic voxel resolution clinical sodium scan within 12 minutes. We also presented prescanned phantom sensitivity map results, which were designed to cover all patient head sizes. This approach provides an alternative solution in more time-sensitive cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.