Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35989307›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Cross-modal functional connectivity supports speech understanding in cochlear implant users.

Amanda M Fullerton, Deborah A Vickers, Robert Luke, Addison N Billing, David McAlpine, Heivet Hernandez-Perez, Jonathan E Peelle, Jessica J M Monaghan, Catherine M McMahon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamic functional connectivity following cochlear implantation: Predicting speech outcomes and exploring brain network dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cross-modal functional plasticity after cochlear implantation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Amanda M FullertonDepartment of Linguistics and Macquarie University Hearing, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2312-8026
Deborah A VickersCambridge Hearing Group, Sound Lab, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 OSZ, United Kingdom.
Robert LukeDepartment of Linguistics and Macquarie University Hearing, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.
Addison N BillingInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WCIN 3AZ, United Kingdom.
David McAlpineDepartment of Linguistics and Macquarie University Hearing, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.
Heivet Hernandez-PerezDepartment of Linguistics and Macquarie University Hearing, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.
Jonathan E PeelleDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
Jessica J M MonaghanNational Acoustic Laboratories, Australian Hearing Hub, Sydney 2109, Australia.
Catherine M McMahonDepartment of Linguistics and Macquarie University Hearing, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.
Australian Hearing · AUUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S002537/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory deprivation can lead to cross-modal cortical changes, whereby sensory brain regions deprived of input may be recruited to perform atypical function. Enhanced cross-modal responses to visual stimuli observed in auditory cortex of postlingually deaf cochlear implant (CI) users are hypothesized to reflect increased activation of cortical language regions, but it is unclear if this cross-modal activity is "adaptive" or "mal-adaptive" for speech understanding. To determine if increased activation of language regions is correlated with better speech understanding in CI users, we assessed task-related activation and functional connectivity of auditory and visual cortices to auditory and visual speech and non-speech stimuli in CI users (n = 14) and normal-hearing listeners (n = 17) and used functional near-infrared spectroscopy to measure hemodynamic responses. We used visually presented speech and non-speech to investigate neural processes related to linguistic content and observed that CI users show beneficial cross-modal effects. Specifically, an increase in connectivity between the left auditory and visual cortices-presumed primary sites of cortical language processing-was positively correlated with CI users' abilities to understand speech in background noise. Cross-modal activity in auditory cortex of postlingually deaf CI users may reflect adaptive activity of a distributed, multimodal speech network, recruited to enhance speech understanding.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessSpeech PerceptionHumanscochlear implantcross-modal plasticityfunctional connectivityfunctional near-infrared spectroscopyspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID35989307
PMCPMC10068270
OpenAlexW4292681599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.