Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35989306›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Dynamic changes in spatial representation within the posterior parietal cortex in response to visuomotor adaptation.

S Schintu, D J Kravitz, E H Silson, C A Cunningham, E M Wassermann, S Shomstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S SchintuBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6362-3905
D J KravitzDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, 2125 G St NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
E H SilsonLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, Section on Learning and Plasticity, National Institute of Mental Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
C A CunninghamBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
E M WassermannBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
S ShomsteinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, 2125 G St NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA.

Funding

Electrophysiological Probes And Treatments In Neurobehavioral DisordersZIANS002977 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI WASSERMANN, ERIC M · 2009 to 2025
$14.6M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB-V003917-1Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS002977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) population receptive field (pRF) mapping to demonstrate that retinotopic organization extends from the primary visual cortex to ventral and dorsal visual pathways, by quantifying visual field maps, receptive field size, and laterality throughout multiple areas. Visuospatial representation in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is modulated by attentional deployment, raising the question of whether spatial representation in the PPC is dynamic and flexible, and whether this flexibility contributes to visuospatial learning. To answer this question, changes in spatial representation within the PPC and early visual cortex were recorded with pRF mapping before and after prism adaptation (PA)-a well-established visuomotor technique that modulates visuospatial attention according to the direction of the visual displacement. As predicted, results showed that adaptation to left-shifting prisms increases pRF size in left PPC, while leaving space representation in the early visual cortex unchanged. This is the first evidence that PA drives a dynamic reorganization of response profiles in the PPC. These findings show that spatial representations in the PPC not only reflect changes driven by attentional deployment but dynamically change in response to modulation of external factors such as manipulation of the visuospatial input during visuomotor adaptation.

Indexed as

Brain MappingParietal LobeFunctional LateralityMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhotic StimulationVisual Fieldsintraparietal sulcuspRFprims adaptationreceptive fieldvisuospatial attention

Identifiers

PMID35989306
PMCPMC10068280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.