Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35988902›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2022

Selective and comparative genome architecture of Asian cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) attributed to domestication and modern breeding.

Xueqiang Wang, Wensheng Wang, Shuaishuai Tai, Min Li, Qiang Gao, Zhiqiang Hu, Wushu Hu, Zhichao Wu, Xiaoyang Zhu, Jianyin Xie and 25 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The selection and application of tiller number QTLs in modern wheat breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Xueqiang WangState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Wensheng WangInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; The College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Shuaishuai TaiBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Min LiThe College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Qiang GaoBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Zhiqiang HuInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Wushu HuBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Zhichao WuInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Xiaoyang ZhuState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Jianyin XieState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Fengmei LiState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Zhifang ZhangState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Linran ZhiState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Fan ZhangInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; The College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Xiaoqian MaState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Ming YangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Jiabao XuBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Yanhong LiBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Wenzhuo ZhangState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xiyu YangState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Ying ChenCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Yan ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Binying FuInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Xiuqin ZhaoInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Jinjie LiState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Miao WangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Zhen YueBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Xiaodong FangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Wei ZengThe College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Ye YinBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Gengyun ZhangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Jianlong XuInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Hongliang ZhangState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: zhangl@cau.edu.cn.
Zichao LiState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: lizichao@cau.edu.cn.
Zhikang LiInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; The College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China. Electronic address: lizhikang@caas.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRice, Oryza sativa L. (Os), is one of the oldest domesticated cereals that has also gone through extensive improvement in modern breeding.

objectivesHow rice was domesticated and impacted by modern breeding.

methodsWe performed comprehensive analyses of genomic sequences of 504 accessions of Os and 456 accessions of O. rufipogon/O. nivara (Or).

resultsThe natural selection on Or before domestication and the natural and artificial selection during domestication together shaped the well-differentiated genomes of two subspecies, geng(j) (japonica) and xian(i) (indica), while breeding has made apparent genomic imprints between landrace and modern varieties of each subspecies, and also between primary modern and advanced modern varieties of xian(i). Selection during domestication and breeding left genome-wide selective signals covering ∼ 22.8 % and ∼ 8.6 % of the Os genome, significantly reduced within-population genomic diversity by ∼ 22 % in xian(i) and ∼ 53 % in geng(j) plus more pronounced subspecific differentiation. Only ∼ 10 % reduction in the total genomic diversity was observed between the Os and Or populations, indicating domestication did not suffer severe genetic bottleneck.

conclusionOur results revealed clear differentiation of the Or accessions into three large populations, two of which correspond to the well-differentiated Os subspecies, geng(j) and xian(i). Improved productivity and common changes in the same suit of adaptive traits in xian(i) and geng(j) during domestication and breeding resulted apparently from compensatory and convergent selections for different genes/alleles acting in the common KEGG terms and/or same gene families, and thus maintaining or even increasing the within population diversity and subspecific differentiation of Os, while more genes/alleles of novel function were selected during domestication than modern breeding. Our results supported the multiple independent domestication of Os in Asia and suggest the more efficient utilization of the rich diversity within Os by exploiting inter-subspecific and among population diversity in future rice improvement.

Indexed as

OryzaCrops, AgriculturalDomesticationGenomicsPlant BreedingDomesticationModern breedingNovel functional variation selectionOryza sativaStanding functional variation selection

Identifiers

PMID35988902
PMCPMC9788959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.