Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35988464›Full record

Trial reportEBioMedicine2022

Effect of intra-partum azithromycin on the development of the infant nasopharyngeal microbiota: A post hoc analysis of a double-blind randomized trial.

Bakary Sanyang, Thushan I de Silva, Abdoulie Kanteh, Abdoulie Bojang, Jarra Manneh, Wouter A A de Steenhuijsen Piters, Chikondi Peno, Debby Bogaert, Abdul Karim Sesay, Anna Roca

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Bakary SanyangDisease Control and Elimination, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, Gambia; The Genomics Core Lab, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, Gambia. Electronic address: bsanyang@mrc.gm.
Thushan I de SilvaThe Florey Institute and Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Vaccines and Immunity, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, Gambia.
Abdoulie KantehThe Genomics Core Lab, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, Gambia.
Abdoulie BojangDisease Control and Elimination, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, Gambia.
Jarra MannehThe Genomics Core Lab, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, Gambia.
Wouter A A de Steenhuijsen PitersDepartment of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Chikondi PenoCentre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Debby BogaertDepartment of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Abdul Karim SesayThe Genomics Core Lab, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, Gambia.
Anna RocaDisease Control and Elimination, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, Gambia; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: aroca@mrc.gm.
MRC Unit the Gambia · GMWilhelmina Children's Hospital · NLLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a leading cause of neonatal death. Intrapartum azithromycin reduces neonatal nasopharyngeal carriage of potentially pathogenic bacteria, a prerequisite for sepsis. Early antibiotic exposure has been associated with microbiota perturbations with varying effects. This study aims to understand the effect of intrapartum azithromycin intervention on the developing nasopharyngeal microbiota of the child.

methodsUsing 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we analysed the microbiota of 343 nasopharyngeal samples collected from birth to 12 months from 109 healthy infants selected from a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in the Gambia (PregnAnZI-1). In the trial, 829 women were given 2g oral azithromycin or placebo (1:1) during labour with the objective of reducing bacterial carriage in mother and child during the neonatal period. The post-hoc analysis presented here assessed the effect of the intervention on the child nasopharyngeal microbiota development.

findings55 children were from mothers given azithromycin and 54 from mothers given placebo. Comparing arms, we found an increase in alpha-diversity at day-6 (p = 0·018), and a significant effect on overall microbiota composition at days 6 and 28 (R

interpretationThese results indicate that intrapartum azithromycin caused short-term alterations in the nasopharyngeal microbiota with modest overall effect at 12 months of age. Further exploration of the effects of these variations on microbiome function will give more insight on the potential risks and benefits, for the child, associated with this intervention.

fundingThis work was jointly funded by the Medical Research Council (UK) (MC_EX_MR/J010391/1/MRC), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1196513), and MRCG@LSHTM Doctoral Training Program.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinBacteriaChildDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAzithromycinInfantIntrapartumNasopharyngeal microbiotaWest Africa

Identifiers

PMID35988464
PMCPMC9420482
OpenAlexW4292679339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.