Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35988126›Full record

ArticlePlanta2022

Comparing anatomy, chemical composition, and water permeability of suberized organs in five plant species: wax makes the difference.

Kiran Suresh, Viktoria V Zeisler-Diehl, Tobias Wojciechowski, Lukas Schreiber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kiran SureshInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, Department of Ecophysiology, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7959-6323
Viktoria V Zeisler-DiehlInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, Department of Ecophysiology, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7050-9716
Tobias WojciechowskiIBG-2, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428, Jülich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3439-2500
Lukas SchreiberInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, Department of Ecophysiology, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany. lukas.schreiber@uni-bonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-9929
University of Bonn · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCH506/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThe efficiency of suberized plant/environment interfaces as transpiration barriers is not established by the suberin polymer but by the wax molecules sorbed to the suberin polymer. Suberized cell walls formed as barriers at the plant/soil or plant/atmosphere interface in various plant organs (soil-grown roots, aerial roots, tubers, and bark) were enzymatically isolated from five different plant species (Clivia miniata, Monstera deliciosa, Solanum tuberosum, Manihot esculenta, and Malus domestica). Anatomy, chemical composition and efficiency as transpiration barriers (water loss in m s

Indexed as

Solanum tuberosumWaterPermeabilityPlantsPolymersSoilPolymersSoilWaterBarkDiffusion barrierPeridermStorage rootSuberizationTranspirationTuberWater lossWax

Identifiers

PMID35988126
PMCPMC9393130
OpenAlexW4292681493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.