Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35988095›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

Reproductive outcomes from ten years of elective oocyte cryopreservation.

Lorraine S Kasaven, Benjamin P Jones, Carleen Heath, Rabi Odia, Joycelia Green, Aviva Petrie, Srdjan Saso, Paul Serhal, Jara Ben Nagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Nesting the Eggs on Another Day: Social Egg Freezing.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lorraine S Kasaven *Department of Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 OHS, UK. Lk226@doctors.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1752-5220
Benjamin P Jones *Department of Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 OHS, UK.
Carleen HeathCentre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5QS, UK.
Rabi OdiaCentre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5QS, UK.
Joycelia GreenCentre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5QS, UK.
Aviva PetrieBiostatistics Unit, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, 256 Grays Inn Road, London, WC1X 8LD, UK.
Srdjan SasoDepartment of Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 OHS, UK.
Paul SerhalCentre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5QS, UK.
Jara Ben NagiCentre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5QS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

research questionTo assess the relationship between the number of oocytes retrieved during elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC) cycles with various clinical, biochemical, and radiological markers, including age, body mass index (BMI), baseline anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), Oestradiol level (E2) and total number of follicles ≥ 12 mm on the day of trigger. To also report the reproductive outcomes from women who underwent EOC.

methodsA retrospective cohort of 373 women embarking on EOC and autologous oocyte thaw cycles between 2008 and 2018 from a single London clinic in the United Kingdom.

results483 stimulation cycles were undertaken amongst 373 women. The median (range) age at cryopreservation was 38 (26-47) years old. The median numbers of oocytes retrieved per cycle was 8 (0-37) and the median total oocytes cryopreserved per woman was 8 (0-45). BMI, E2 level and number of follicles ≥ 12 mm at trigger were all significant predictors of oocyte yield. Multivariate analysis confirmed there was no significant relationship between AFC or AMH, whilst on univariate analysis statistical significance was proven. Thirty six women returned to use their cryopreserved oocytes, of which there were 41 autologous oocyte thaw cycles undertaken. There were 12 successful livebirths achieved by 11 women. The overall livebirth rate was 26.8% per cycle. No livebirths were achieved in women who underwent EOC ≥ 40 years old, and 82% of all livebirths were achieved in women who had done so between 36 and 39 years old.

conclusionClinical, biochemical and radiological markers can predict oocyte yield in EOC cycles. Reproductive outcomes are more favourable when cryopreservation is performed before the age of 36, with lower success rates of livebirth observed in women aged 40 years and above.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationAnti-Mullerian HormoneCryopreservationEstradiolFemaleHumansOocyte RetrievalOocytesRetrospective StudiesAnti-Mullerian HormoneEstradiolAnti-Müllerian hormoneElective oocyte cryopreservationFertility preservationLivebirth rateVitrification

Identifiers

PMID35988095
PMCPMC9519701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.