Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35987957›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

Topical pharmacotherapy for ocular surface squamous neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kincső Kozma, Zsuzsa Réka Dömötör, Adrienne Csutak, László Szabó, Péter Hegyi, Bálint Erőss, Zsuzsanna Helyes, Zsolt Molnár, Fanni Dembrovszky, Eszter Szalai

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Use of Mitomycin C in Ophthalmic Surgery.Journal of current ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kincső KozmaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pecs, Rakoczi u. 2, 7623, Pecs, Hungary.
Zsuzsa Réka DömötörDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary.
Adrienne CsutakDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pecs, Rakoczi u. 2, 7623, Pecs, Hungary.
László SzabóInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Péter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Bálint ErőssInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna HelyesDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624, Pécs, Hungary.
Zsolt MolnárInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Fanni DembrovszkyInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Eszter SzalaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pecs, Rakoczi u. 2, 7623, Pecs, Hungary. szalai.eszter@pte.hu.
University of Pecs · HUSemmelweis University · HUUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) has different treatment modalities. Although surgical excision has been the gold standard therapeutic option, topical pharmacotherapy agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), interferon alfa-2b (IFN) and mitomycin-C (MMC) are also commonly used. The protocol was registered (CRD42021224961). Comprehensive literature research was carried out to compare topical pharmacotherapy (5-FU or IFN or MMC) to surgical excision regarding clinical success (tumor resolution), recurrence and complications in patients undergoing treatment for OSSN. From 7859 records, 7 articles were included in the qualitative and 4 in the quantitative synthesis. The outcomes of surgical excision and topical pharmacotherapy were comparable in the included articles. There were no significant differences between surgical excision and topical pharmacotherapy regarding the clinical success [odds ratio (OR): 0.785; confidence interval (CI): 0.130-4.736, P = 0.792)] and tumor recurrence (OR: 0.746; CI: 0.213-2.609; P = 0.646). The most common side effect of the different therapeutic options was dry eye. The highest rate of dry eye symptoms was reported after surgical excision (in 59%). Topical pharmacotherapy with all the 3 agents is as effective and well-tolerable as surgical excision in terms of tumor resolution, recurrence rate and side effects in all OSSN patients suggesting similar long-term clinical benefits.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellConjunctival NeoplasmsEye NeoplasmsAdministration, TopicalFluorouracilHumansInterferon alpha-2MitomycinRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFluorouracilInterferon alpha-2Mitomycin

Identifiers

PMID35987957
PMCPMC9392743
OpenAlexW4292430005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.