ArticleNano-micro letters2022
Importance of Standardizing Analytical Characterization Methodology for Improved Reliability of the Nanomedicine Literature.
Article in Nano-micro letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- The tumor microenvironment in triple negative breast cancer and a strategy to improve responses to immunotherapy using cryoablation and immunostimulants.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Toxicity of nanostructures in drug delivery applications.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2026Review
- The Translational Paradox of Cancer Nanomedicine: Biological, Pharmacokinetic, and Manufacturing Barriers to Clinical Success.Biology · 2026Review
- Theranostic Smart Bionanosensors for Solid Tumors: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Applications of Nanofabrication Technologies in the Preparation of Biomimetic Structures.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biogenic Metal Nanoparticles from Indian Flora as Programmable Bio-Interfaces: From Phytochemical Coronas to Precision Nanomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Nanoparticles synthesis, properties and promising devices for drug delivery systems: a review.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial nanomaterials at the nanoscale: design principles, mechanisms, and global challenges.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Aptamer-Functionalized Nanocarriers for Bone and Joint Diseases: Engineering Design Rules and Translational Roadmap.Small science · 2026Article
- Engineered MoSNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Targeting Ferroptosis Pathways for Synaptic Protection in Sevoflurane-Induced Cognitive Impairment: A Nanomedicine Approach.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Reproducibility in Carbon Nanotube-Based Hydrogels: The Role of CNT Material State and Reporting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mass spectrometry-based top-down proteomics for proteoform profiling of protein coronas.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Biocompatible Thin Films Deposited by Laser Techniques.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Barrier-to-Design Codes for Organ-Targeted Nanomedicine: A Framework Linking Barrier Phenotypes to Nano-Bio Interface Design and Translational Validation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Carbon Quantum Dots as Versatile Nanosystems for Biomedical Innovation: Mechanisms, Applications, and Translational Prospects.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Enhancing the Safety of Nanoparticles in Medicine: Highlights of Progress and Critical Objectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Harnessing Dietary Tryptophan: Bridging the Gap Between Neurobiology and Psychiatry in Depression Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advancements in nanomaterials for the treatment and management of vascular surgeries: from drug delivery to biomedical implants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Application and Advances of Cell Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles in Diabetic Wound Healing.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the interaction between biological structures and nanoscale technologies, dubbed the nano-bio interface, is required for successful development of safe and efficient nanomedicine products. The lack of a universal reporting system and decentralized methodologies for nanomaterial characterization have resulted in a low degree of reliability and reproducibility in the nanomedicine literature. As such, there is a strong need to establish a characterization system to support the reproducibility of nanoscience data particularly for studies seeking clinical translation. Here, we discuss the existing key standards for addressing robust characterization of nanomaterials based on their intended use in medical devices or as pharmaceuticals. We also discuss the challenges surrounding implementation of such standard protocols and their implication for translation of nanotechnology into clinical practice. We, however, emphasize that practical implementation of standard protocols in experimental laboratories requires long-term planning through integration of stakeholders including institutions and funding agencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.