ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2022
Predicting the mutation effects of protein-ligand interactions via end-point binding free energy calculations: strategies and analyses.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ligand-mediated conformation diversity of Hsp90 revealed by GaMD simulations and Markov model.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Recent Progress and Prospect in Studying Selective Inhibitors Toward Bromodomain Family Members.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Single-molecule FRET Spectroscopy: From Computational FRET Estimation to Experimental Data Interpretation.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Review
- Mechanistic insights into daidzin from Glycine max against breast cancer via network pharmacology and multi-level molecular modeling.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Identifying Inhibitor-SARS-CoV2-3CLMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating data partitioning strategies for accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding free energy changes in mutated proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- A potent new-scaffold androgen receptor antagonist discovered on the basis of a MIEC-SVM model.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2024Article
- Identification of FDA-approved drugs with triple targeting mode of action for the treatment of monkeypox: a high throughput virtual screening study.Molecular diversity · 2024Article
- Synthesis of Pyrrolo[3,4-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Structural Insights into Neonicotinoids and N-Unsubstituted Metabolites on Human nAChRs by Molecular Docking, Dynamics Simulations, and Calcium Imaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Evaluating the ability of end-point methods to predict the binding affinity tendency of protein kinase inhibitors.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Uncovering the Kinetic Characteristics and Degradation Preference of PROTAC Systems with Advanced Theoretical Analyses.JACS Au · 2023Article
- Deciphering the Shared and Specific Drug Resistance Mechanisms of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase via Binding Free Energy Computation.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Protein mutations occur frequently in biological systems, which may impact, for example, the binding of drugs to their targets through impairing the critical H-bonds, changing the hydrophobic interactions, etc. Thus, accurately predicting the effects of mutations on biological systems is of great interests to various fields. Unfortunately, it is still unavailable to conduct large-scale wet-lab mutation experiments because of the unaffordable experimental time and financial costs. Alternatively, in silico computation can serve as a pioneer to guide the experiments. In fact, numerous pioneering works have been conducted from computationally cheaper machine-learning (ML) methods to the more expensive alchemical methods with the purpose to accurately predict the mutation effects. However, these methods usually either cannot result in a physically understandable model (ML-based methods) or work with huge computational resources (alchemical methods). Thus, compromised methods with good physical characteristics and high computational efficiency are expected. Therefore, here, we conducted a comprehensive investigation on the mutation issues of biological systems with the famous end-point binding free energy calculation methods represented by MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA. Different computational strategies considering different length of MD simulations, different value of dielectric constants and whether to incorporate entropy effects to the predicted total binding affinities were investigated to provide a more accurate way for predicting the energetic change upon protein mutations. Overall, our result shows that a relatively long MD simulation (e.g. 100 ns) benefits the prediction accuracy for both MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA (with the best Pearson correlation coefficient between the predicted ∆∆G and the experimental data of ~ 0.44 for a challenging dataset). Further analyses shows that systems involving large perturbations (e.g. multiple mutations and large number of atoms change in the mutation site) are much easier to be accurately predicted since the algorithm works more sensitively to the large change of the systems. Besides, system-specific investigation reveals that conformational adjustment is needed to refine the micro-environment of the manually mutated systems and thus lead one to understand why longer MD simulation is necessary to improve the predicting result. The proposed strategy is expected to be applied in large-scale mutation effects investigation with interpretation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.