Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35987824›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Evaluation of a hybrid pipeline for automated segmentation of solid lesions based on mathematical algorithms and deep learning.

Liam Burrows, Ke Chen, Weihong Guo, Martin Hossack, Richard G McWilliams, Francesco Torella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Liam BurrowsCentre for Mathematical Imaging Techniques and Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZL, UK. liam.burrows@liv.ac.uk.
Ke ChenCentre for Mathematical Imaging Techniques and Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZL, UK. k.chen@liv.ac.uk.
Weihong GuoDepartment of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Martin HossackLiverpool Vascular and Endovascular Service, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Richard G McWilliamsDepartment of Radiology, Liverpool University Hospitals, Liverpool, UK.
Francesco TorellaLiverpool Vascular and Endovascular Service, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBAintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluate the accuracy of an original hybrid segmentation pipeline, combining variational and deep learning methods, in the segmentation of CT scans of stented aortic aneurysms, abdominal organs and brain lesions. The hybrid pipeline is trained on 50 aortic CT scans and tested on 10. Additionally, we trained and tested the hybrid pipeline on publicly available datasets of CT scans of abdominal organs and MR scans of brain tumours. We tested the accuracy of the hybrid pipeline against a gold standard (manual segmentation) and compared its performance to that of a standard automated segmentation method with commonly used metrics, including the DICE and JACCARD and volumetric similarity (VS) coefficients, and the Hausdorff Distance (HD). Results. The hybrid pipeline produced very accurate segmentations of the aorta, with mean DICE, JACCARD and VS coefficients of: 0.909, 0.837 and 0.972 in thrombus segmentation and 0.937, 0.884 and 0.970 for stent and lumen segmentation. It consistently outperformed the standard automated method. Similar results were observed when the hybrid pipeline was trained and tested on publicly available datasets, with mean DICE scores of: 0.832 on brain tumour segmentation, and 0.894/0.841/0.853/0.847/0.941 on left kidney/right kidney/spleen/aorta/liver organ segmentation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35987824
PMCPMC9392778
OpenAlexW4292430048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.