Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35987776›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2022

Optimising a multi-strategy implementation intervention to improve the delivery of a school physical activity policy at scale: findings from a randomised noninferiority trial.

Cassandra Lane, Luke Wolfenden, Alix Hall, Rachel Sutherland, Patti-Jean Naylor, Chris Oldmeadow, Lucy Leigh, Adam Shoesmith, Adrian Bauman, Nicole McCarthy and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readEquivalence TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence of Physical Activity Initiatives in Australian Primary Schools: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cassandra LaneSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle NSW, 1 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. Cassandra.lane1@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-8554
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle NSW, 1 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Alix HallSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle NSW, 1 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Rachel SutherlandSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle NSW, 1 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Patti-Jean NaylorSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Chris OldmeadowHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
Lucy LeighHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
Adam ShoesmithSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle NSW, 1 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Adrian BaumanSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicole McCarthySchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle NSW, 1 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Nicole NathanSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle NSW, 1 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo maximise their potential health benefits, school-based physical activity policies need to be implemented at scale. This paper describes the third in a sequence of trials that sought to optimise an effective strategy (PACE) to assist schools' implementation of a physical activity policy. Specifically, it aimed to determine the probability that a multi-strategy intervention adapted to reduce in-person contact (Adapted PACE) was "as good as" the original intervention (PACE) in increasing the weekly minutes of structured physical activity implemented by classroom teachers.

methodsA noninferiority cluster randomised controlled trial was undertaken with 48 primary schools in New South Wales, Australia. Schools were randomised to receive PACE or a model with adaptations made to the delivery modes (Adapted PACE). Teachers' scheduled minutes of weekly physical activity was assessed at baseline (Oct 2018-Feb 2019) and 12-month follow-up (Oct-Dec 2019). The noninferiority margin was set at - 16.4 minutes based on previous data and decision panel consensus. A linear mixed model analysed within a Bayesian framework was used to explore noninferiority between the two PACE models. A cost minimisation analysis was conducted from the health service provider perspective, using the Australian dollar (AUD).

resultsThe posterior estimate for the between group difference at follow-up was - 2.3 minutes (95% credible interval = - 18.02, 14.45 minutes). There was an estimated 96% probability of Adapted PACE being considered noninferior (only 4% of the posterior samples crossed the noninferiority margin of - 16.4 minutes). That is, the minutes of physical activity implemented by teachers at Adapted PACE schools was not meaningfully less than the minutes of physical activity implemented by teachers at PACE schools. The mean total cost was AUD$25,375 (95% uncertainty interval = $21,499, $29,106) for PACE and AUD$16,421 (95% uncertainty interval = $13,974, $19,656) for Adapted PACE; an estimated reduction of AUD$373 (95% uncertainty interval = $173, $560) per school.

conclusionsIt is highly probable that Adapted PACE is noninferior to the original model. It is a cost-efficient alternative also likely to be a more suitable approach to supporting large scale implementation of school physical activity policies.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001229167).

Indexed as

Health PromotionSchool Health ServicesAustraliaBayes TheoremExerciseHumansPolicySchoolsadaptationschildrenimplementationnoninferiorityoptimisationphysical activitypolicyscale-upschool

Identifiers

PMID35987776
PMCPMC9392334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.