Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35987486›Full record

ReviewThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice2022

Safety of Biologics for Atopic Diseases During Pregnancy.

Fnu Shakuntulla, Sergio E Chiarella

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. International survey of treatment practices for atopic dermatitis in pregnant and breastfeeding women: Physician perspectives.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fnu ShakuntullaDivision of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Sergio E ChiarellaDivision of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Electronic address: Chiarella.Sergio@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Sex-Specific Effects of Endocrine Disruption on Aging and Alzheimer's DiseaseU54AG044170 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KAPOOR, EKTA · 2018 to 2022
$7.7M
Sex-specific Risk for Vascular Dysfunction and Cognitive DeclineP50AG044170 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MILLER, VIRGINIA M · 2012 to 2017
$6.1M
Gender-specific effects of puberty on airway epithelial differentiation in asthmaK08AI141765 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CHIARELLA, SERGIO E · 2019 to 2023
$929k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI141765NIA NIH HHS P50 AG044170NIA NIH HHS U54 AG044170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high prevalence of atopic diseases in women of childbearing age reveals the need to determine the safety of biologics during pregnancy. This review summarizes the effects of 7 Food and Drug Administration-approved biologics (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, tezepelumab, and tralokinumab) on maternal and fetal outcomes. For this purpose, we reviewed English-language publications to investigate whether the use of biologics for atopic diseases during pregnancy increased the risk of preterm delivery, stillbirth, low birth weight, or congenital malformations. Most publications found were case reports, case series, or observational studies reporting outcomes in a total of 313 pregnancies. No randomized controlled studies were identified. We found that biologics do not seem to influence maternal or fetal outcomes. Indeed, worsening of the underlying atopic disease during pregnancy appears to be more detrimental to the viability of the pregnancy. Given the small sample size and scarcity of studies, future research should include prospective studies with comparable control groups without exposure to biologics and multicenter registries for long-term follow-up.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaBiological ProductsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMulticenter Studies as TopicOmalizumabPregnancyProspective StudiesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBiological ProductsOmalizumabAsthmaAtopic dermatitisAtopic diseasesBenralizumabBiologicsBirth weightChronic urticariaCongenital malformationsDupilumabMepolizumabOmalizumabPregnancyPretermReslizumabSafetyStillbirthTezepelumabTralokinumab

Identifiers

PMID35987486
PMCPMC10084524
OpenAlexW4293065391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.