Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35986750›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2023

Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Enzo Lüsebrink, Leonhard Binzenhöfer, Antonia Kellnar, Christoph Müller, Clemens Scherer, Benedikt Schrage, Dominik Joskowiak, Tobias Petzold, Daniel Braun, Stefan Brunner and 10 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03637205 nacompletednot on this map

Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing Extracorporeal Life Support Plus Optimal Medical Care Versus Optimal Medical Care Alone in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Revascularization

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelios Health Institute GmbHRan2019 to 2024Enrolled420ConditionsAcute Myocardial Infarction, Cardiogenic ShockArmsECLS insertion, Revascularisation and optimal medical treatment
NCT03813134 naunknown statusnot on this map

EURO SHOCK Testing the Value of Novel Strategy and Its Cost Efficacy in Order to Improve the Poor Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LeicesterRan2019 to 2024Enrolled428ConditionsCardiogenic ShockArmsPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), Pharmacological Support, VA-ECMO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Hemodynamic effects of the combined support with VAV-ECMO, Impella CP, and Impella RP.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Article
  20. Sex-related differences in patients presenting with heart failure-related cardiogenic shock.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Enzo LüsebrinkCardiac Intensive Care Unit, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, Klinikum Der Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-5672
Leonhard BinzenhöferCardiac Intensive Care Unit, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, Klinikum Der Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Antonia KellnarCardiac Intensive Care Unit, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, Klinikum Der Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christoph MüllerHerzchirurgische Klinik Und Poliklinik, Klinikum Der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Clemens SchererCardiac Intensive Care Unit, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, Klinikum Der Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Benedikt SchrageDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Dominik JoskowiakHerzchirurgische Klinik Und Poliklinik, Klinikum Der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Tobias PetzoldCardiac Intensive Care Unit, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, Klinikum Der Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Daniel BraunCardiac Intensive Care Unit, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, Klinikum Der Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Stefan BrunnerCardiac Intensive Care Unit, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, Klinikum Der Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Sven PeterssHerzchirurgische Klinik Und Poliklinik, Klinikum Der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Jörg HausleiterCardiac Intensive Care Unit, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, Klinikum Der Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian ZimmerMedizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Frank BornHerzchirurgische Klinik Und Poliklinik, Klinikum Der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Dirk WestermannDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Holger ThieleDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Leipzig Heart Institute, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas SchäferKlinik Für Kardiologie Und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Christian HaglHerzchirurgische Klinik Und Poliklinik, Klinikum Der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Steffen MassbergCardiac Intensive Care Unit, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, Klinikum Der Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Martin OrbanCardiac Intensive Care Unit, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, Klinikum Der Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. MartinOrban@gmail.com.
LMU Klinikum · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DELeipzig Heart Institute · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest contribute pre-dominantly to mortality in acute cardiovascular care. Here, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has emerged as an established therapeutic option for patients suffering from these life-threatening entities. VA-ECMO provides temporary circulatory support until causative treatments are effective and enables recovery or serves as a bridging strategy to surgical ventricular assist devices, heart transplantation or decision-making. However, in-hospital mortality rate in this treatment population is still around 60%. In the recently published ARREST trial, VA-ECMO treatment lowered mortality rate in patients with ongoing cardiac arrest due to therapy refractory ventricular fibrillation compared to standard advanced cardiac life support in selected patients. Whether VA-ECMO can reduce mortality compared to standard of care in cardiogenic shock has to be evaluated in the ongoing prospective randomized studies EURO-SHOCK (NCT03813134) and ECLS-SHOCK (NCT03637205). As an innate drawback of VA-ECMO treatment, the retrograde aortic flow could lead to an elevation of left ventricular (LV) afterload, increase in LV filling pressure, mitral regurgitation, and elevated left atrial pressure. This may compromise myocardial function and recovery, pulmonary hemodynamics-possibly with concomitant pulmonary congestion and even lung failure-and contribute to poor outcomes in a relevant proportion of treated patients. To overcome these detrimental effects, a multitude of venting strategies are currently engaged for both preventive and emergent unloading. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and structured synopsis of existing venting modalities and their specific hemodynamic characteristics. We discuss in detail the available data on outcome categories and complication rates related to the respective venting option.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart ArrestHeart-Assist DevicesHeart TransplantationHumansProspective StudiesShock, CardiogenicCardiogenic shockDecompressionECMELLAIABPImpellaPercutaneous microaxial pumpUnloadingVA-ECMOVenting

Identifiers

PMID35986750
PMCPMC10050067
OpenAlexW4294104508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read991
identifiers read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.