Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35986594›Full record

SynthesisReviews in medical virology2023

Safety and immunogenicity of Zika virus vaccine: A systematic review of clinical trials.

Mahmuda Yeasmin, Md Maruf Ahmed Molla, H M Abdullah Al Masud, K M Saif-Ur-Rahman

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in medical virology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. An updated review of Zika virus vaccine development.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Evidence map of strategies for preventing and controllingRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A review on Zika vaccine development.Pathogens and disease · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mahmuda YeasminDepartment of Virology, National Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Referral Center, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Maruf Ahmed MollaDepartment of Virology, National Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Referral Center, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5062-9144
H M Abdullah Al MasudDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
K M Saif-Ur-RahmanHealth Systems and Population Studies Division, icddr, b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases · BDOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IESUNY Upstate Medical University · USUniversity of Chittagong · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several phase-1 clinical trials have been performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of candidate anti-Zika vaccines. In this systematic review, we systematically evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of candidate vaccines, which would aid researchers in formulating an effective vaccination strategy for phase-2 trials based on current evidence. A literature search was conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE through Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database for relevant studies on candidate anti-zika vaccines. Studies on animal models were excluded from our study. Healthy individuals who were administered candidate Zika vaccines to evaluate the immune response and adverse events (AEs) compared to placebo were considered. Data were extracted, tabulated, and analysed using Microsoft Excel, while the risk of bias plots were generated using tidyverse and Robvis packages in R-studio. A total of five phase-1 clinical trials were included in our analysis comprising of studies on inactivated, viral vector, and DNA vaccines. Immunogenicity ranged from 10% to 100% after vaccination with the lowest seroconversion rate (10%) and geometric mean titre (GMT) (6.3; 95% confidence interval (CI):3.7-10.8) observed among recipients of single-dose inactivated anti-zika vaccine (ZPIV). For DNA vaccines, the seroconversion rate ranged from 60% to 100% with the highest seroconversion rate (100%) and GMT (2871; 95% CI:705.3-11688) observed among recipients of three shots of high dose GLS-5700 vaccine. For viral vector vaccine (Ad26.ZIKV.001) seroconversion rate (100%) and GMT peaked after two shots with both low and high-dose vaccines. In all those studies AEs were mostly local including injection site pain, erythema, and itching. The most common systemic AEs included fever, myalgia, nausea, and fatigue. In phase-1 clinical trials, all candidate vaccines were found to be highly immunogenic and relatively safe, especially when administered in higher doses and with the help of needle-free devices.

Indexed as

Vaccines, DNAViral VaccinesZika VirusZika Virus InfectionAnimalsAntibodies, ViralVaccinationAntibodies, ViralVaccines, DNAViral Vaccinesclinical trialvaccinevaccine safetyzika virus

Identifiers

PMID35986594
PMCPMC10077998
OpenAlexW4292544138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.