Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35986583›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2022

'Doing the best we can': Registered Nurses' experiences and perceptions of patient safety in intensive care during COVID-19.

Louise Caroline Stayt, Clair Merriman, Suzanne Bench, Ann M Price, Sarah Vollam, Helen Walthall, Nicki Credland, Karin Gerber, Vid Calovski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Louise Caroline StaytOxford Brookes University/Oxford University NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7362-7224
Clair MerrimanOxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Suzanne BenchGuys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ann M PriceCanterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7912-9680
Sarah VollamNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Helen WalthallOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Nicki CredlandUniversity of Hull MMedSci, Hull, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7955-457X
Karin GerberRoyal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, UK.
Vid CalovskiOxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Brookes University · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBCanterbury Christ Church University · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Berkshire Hospital · GBUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore registered nurses' experiences of patient safety in intensive care during COVID-19.

designA qualitative interview study informed by constructivism.

methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted and audio-recorded with 19 registered nurses who worked in intensive care during COVID-19 between May and July 2021. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed utilizing framework.

resultsTwo key themes were identified. 'On a war footing'-an unprecedented situation which describes the situation nurses faced, and the actions are taken to prepare for the safe delivery of care. 'Doing the best we can'-Safe Delivery of Care which describes the ramifications of the actions taken on short- and long-term patient safety including organization of care, missed and suboptimal care and communication. Both themes were embedded in the landscape of Staff Well-being and Peer Support.

conclusionNurses reported an increase in patient safety risks which they attributed to the dilution of skill mix and fragmentation of care. Nurses demonstrated an understanding of the holistic and long-term impacts on patient safety and recovery from critical illness. IMPACT: This study explored the perceived impact of COVID-19 on patient safety in intensive care from a nursing perspective. Dilution of skill mix, where specialist critical care registered nurses were diluted with registered nurses with no critical care experience, and the fragmentation of care was perceived to lead to reduced quality of care and increased adverse events and risk of harm which were not consistently formally reported. Furthermore, nurses demonstrated a holistic and long-term appreciation of patient safety. These findings should be considered as part of future nursing workforce modelling and patient safety strategies by intensive care leaders and managers. No public or patient contribution to this study. The study aims and objectives were developed in collaboration with health care professionals.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesCritical CareHumansPatient SafetyQualitative ResearchCOVID-19critical carecritical care nursingpatient safetyqualitative interviews

Identifiers

PMID35986583
PMCPMC9538018
OpenAlexW4292543137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.