ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2022
Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Process Surrogate Modeling of Pediatric Tissue Expansion.
Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational Modeling of Patient-Specific Healing and Deformation Outcomes Following Breast-Conserving Surgery Based on MRI Data.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Predictive Modeling of Human Skin Deformation and Growth During Tissue Expansion in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2025Article
- Targeting platelet-tumor cell interactions: a novel approach to cancer therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Multifidelity deep learning modeling of spatiotemporal lung mechanics.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Numerical investigation of new rete ridge formation in a multi-layer model of skin subjected to tissue expansion.Journal of biomechanics · 2024Article
- Pediatric Craniofacial Tumor Reconstruction.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Growth of skin in response to stretch is the basis for tissue expansion (TE), a procedure to gain new skin area for reconstruction of large defects. Unfortunately, complications and suboptimal outcomes persist because TE is planned and executed based on physician's experience and trial and error instead of predictive quantitative tools. Recently, we calibrated computational models of TE to a porcine animal model of tissue expansion, showing that skin growth is proportional to stretch with a characteristic time constant. Here, we use our calibrated model to predict skin growth in cases of pediatric reconstruction. Available from the clinical setting are the expander shapes and inflation protocols. We create low fidelity semi-analytical models and finite element models for each of the clinical cases. To account for uncertainty in the response expected from translating the models from the animal experiments to the pediatric population, we create multifidelity Gaussian process surrogates to propagate uncertainty in the mechanical properties and the biological response. Predictions with uncertainty for the clinical setting are essential to bridge our knowledge from the large animal experiments to guide and improve the treatment of pediatric patients. Future calibration of the model with patient-specific data-such as estimation of mechanical properties and area growth in the operating room-will change the standard for planning and execution of TE protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.