Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35986398›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2022

What fuels suboptimal care of peripheral intravenous catheter-related infections in hospitals? A qualitative study of decision-making among Spanish nurses.

Ian Blanco-Mavillard, Enrique Castro-Sánchez, Gaizka Parra-García, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Calero, Miquel Bennasar-Veny, Ismael Fernández-Fernández, Harri Lorente-Neches, Joan de Pedro-Gómez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ian Blanco-MavillardHospital Manacor, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Enrique Castro-SánchezUniversity of West London, Brentford, Middlesex, UK. Enrique.Castro.Sanchez@uwl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3351-9496
Gaizka Parra-GarcíaHospital San Juan de Deu, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-CaleroServei de Salut de Les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Miquel Bennasar-VenyUniversitat de Les Illes Balears (UIB), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Ismael Fernández-FernándezHospital Manacor, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Harri Lorente-NechesHealth Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Joan de Pedro-GómezUniversitat de Les Illes Balears (UIB), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands · ESServei de Salut de les Illes Balears · ESFundación Hospital Manacor · ESUniversity of West London · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) are commonly used in hospital worldwide. However, PIVC are not exempt from complications. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) increase morbidity and mortality rates, and costs for the healthcare organization. PIVC care is shaped by the complex mix of professional and organizational culture, such as knowledge gaps, low perception of impact of PIVCs on patient safety, or lack of hospital guidelines.

aimTo explore determinants of decision-making about the prevention of PIVC-BSI among nurses in Spanish hospitals.

methodsWe conducted a descriptive qualitative study with semi-structured interviews in three public hospitals, the Balearic Islands Health Care Service in Spain. We considered hospital ward nurses working routinely with inpatients at any of the three hospitals for enrolment in the study. We approached relevant informants to identify suitable participants who recruited other participants through a 'snowball' technique. Fourteen inpatient nurses from the hospital took part in this study between September and November 2018. We employed several triangulation strategies to underpin the methodological rigour of our analysis and conducted the member checking, showing the information and codes applied in the recording of the interviews to identify the coherence and any discrepancies of the discourse by participants. We used the COREQ checklist for this study.

findingsWe identified four major themes in the analysis related to determinants of care: The fog of decision-making in PIVC; The taskification of PIVC care; PIVC care is accepted to be suboptimal, yet irrelevant; and chasms between perceived determinants of poor PIVC care and its solutions.

conclusionThe clinical management of PIVCs appear ambiguous, unclear, and fragmented, with no clear professional responsibility and no nurse leadership, causing a gap in preventing infections. Furthermore, the perception of low risk on PIVC care impact can cause a relevant lack of adherence to the best evidence and patient safety. Implementing facilitation strategies could improve the fidelity of the best available evidence regarding PIVC care and raise awareness among nurses of impact that excellence of care.

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralCatheter-Related InfectionsHospitals, PublicHumansPatient SafetySpainCatheter-related infectionsClinical decision makingPeripheral venous catheterization

Identifiers

PMID35986398
PMCPMC9389778
OpenAlexW4292373781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.