Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35986372›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Early essential newborn care for cesarean section newborns in China: study protocol for a multi-centered randomized controlled trial.

Xueyin Wang, Xiaosong Zhang, Howard Lawrence Sobel, Zhao Li, Juan Juan, Huixia Yang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06543160 (Immediate Skin-to-Skin Contact and Breastfeeding During Caesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06543160 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Immediate Skin-to-Skin Contact and Breastfeeding During Caesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Early Neonatal Hypoglycemia in Late Preterm and Term Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorQingdao Municipal HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled336ConditionsNeonatal HypoglycemiaArmsImmediate SSC and early breastfeeding during CS, Delayed SSC and breastfeeding after CS, Routine newborn care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xueyin Wang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 1 Xi'anmen Street, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xiaosong Zhang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 1 Xi'anmen Street, Beijing, 100034, China.
Howard Lawrence SobelMaternal, Child Health and Quality and Safety, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.
Zhao LiMaternal, Child Health and Quality and Safety, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.
Juan JuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 1 Xi'anmen Street, Beijing, 100034, China.
Huixia YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 1 Xi'anmen Street, Beijing, 100034, China. yanghuixia@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8954-2102
Peking University · CNWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific · PH

Funding

Save the Children Not applicableUNICEF Not applicableWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly essential newborn care (EENC) is a package of evidence-based and cost-effective interventions delivered around birth mainly including delayed cord clamping, immediate and sustained skin-to-skin contact, and early initiation of exclusive breastfeeding. EENC is proven effective in promoting breastfeeding and improving women's and newborns' health. However, there is little evidence on implementation of EENC on newborns born by cesarean section in China. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of EENC intervention on rates of exclusive breastfeeding and early initiation of breastfeeding for cesarean section newborns in China.

methodsThis is a multi-centered, randomized controlled trial conducted in 4 tertiary hospitals in China. A total of 720 eligible women who will receive cesarean section are being randomized into four groups: control group (n=180), intervention group 1 (skin-to-skin contact for 30 min, n=180), intervention group 2 (skin-to-skin contact for 60 min, n=180), and intervention group 3 (skin-to-skin contact for 90 min, n=180). The control group will receive routine care, whereas the intervention groups will receive EENC with different duration of skin-to-skin contact. Demographic characteristics, clinical information, and breastfeeding outcomes will be collected. The primary outcome is rates of exclusive breastfeeding and early initiation of breastfeeding, and the secondary outcomes include maternal and neonatal morbidity and admissions. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence of the impact of EENC on improvement of breastfeeding outcomes and maternal and neonatal health for cesarean section newborns in China, and evidence-based recommendation to inform optimal duration of skin-to-skin contact for cesarean deliveries. The results of this study have potential to inform national-level guidelines and policy-making for optimizing EENC implementation for cesarean section newborns.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100048997. Retrospectively registered on 19 July 2021.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionInfant CareBreast FeedingChinaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMulticenter Studies as TopicParturitionPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSkinBreastfeedingCesarean sectionDelayed cord clampingEarly essential newborn careSkin-to-skin contact

Identifiers

PMID35986372
PMCPMC9389737
OpenAlexW4292297493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.