Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35986362›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022

Medial pivot prosthesis has a better functional score and lower complication rate than posterior-stabilized prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Weipeng Shi, Yaping Jiang, Yingzhen Wang, Xuan Zhao, Tengbo Yu, Tao Li

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Weipeng Shi *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 59, Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, China.
Yaping Jiang *Department of Oral Implantology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Yingzhen WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 59, Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, China.
Xuan ZhaoDepartment of Rheumatism and Immunology, The Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, 272007, China.
Tengbo YuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 59, Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, China. ytb1970@126.com.
Tao LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 59, Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, China. qdult@qdu.edu.cn.
Qingdao University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to compare the postoperative clinical efficacy and safety of medial pivot (MP) prosthesis and posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthesis in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

methodsAll studies involving MP and PS prosthesis in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched since the establishment of the database. The included outcomes were knee range of motion (ROM), functional score, radiographic results, complication rate, and revision rate. Studies were independently evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control studies and the assessment tool of the Cochrane Collaboration for randomized controlled trials. I

resultsA total of 19 studies, consisting of 3592 patients and 3783 knees (MP: 1811 knees, PS: 1972 knees), were included in the meta-analysis. The WOMAC (MD = - 1.11, 95% CI - 1.98 to - 0.23; P = 0.01) and HSS (MD = - 4.32, 95% CI - 8.30 to - 0.34; P = 0.03) in the MP group were significantly lower compared with the PS group, and the complication rate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.87; P = 0.01) was also lower compared with the PS group. There was no significant difference in ROM, radiographic results, and revision rate between the two groups (P > 0.5).

conclusionsThe existing literature provided evidence to support better clinical effect and lower complication rate of MP prosthesis compared to PS prosthesis. These results provide a reference for clinicians when choosing a suitable prosthesis.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansKnee JointProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, ArticularKnee osteoarthritisMedial pivotMeta-analysisPosterior-stabilizedTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35986362
PMCPMC9392246
OpenAlexW4292367361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.