Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35986349›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Principles and recommendations for incorporating estimands into clinical study protocol templates.

Helle Lynggaard, James Bell, Christian Lösch, Amel Besseghir, Khadija Rantell, Volker Schoder, Vivian Lanius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adjuvant nivolumab vs pembrolizumab in stage IIB/IIC melanoma: a reinforcement learning-based simulation study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Demystifying estimands in cluster-randomised trials.Statistical methods in medical research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Helle LynggaardBiostatistics, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark. HLYN@novonordisk.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2006-3928
James BellElderbrook Solutions GmbH, Buckinghamshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5234-5092
Christian LöschUCB Biosciences GmbH, Monheim am Rhein, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3745-6442
Amel BesseghirUCB Pharma, Brussels, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9666-6808
Khadija RantellMedicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-7650
Volker SchoderMetronomia Clinical Research GmbH, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9077-4859
Vivian LaniusStatistics & Data Insights, Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3935-8187

Funding

European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations in collaboration with European Federation of Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical study protocols are the foundation of good clinical studies. Prospective and multidisciplinary collaboration that pays attention to the design of all components of the study protocol can ensure that a clinical study will answer the research questions posed in a reliable manner that is meaningful for decision-makers and patients. The ICH E9(R1) addendum on estimands and sensitivity analysis in clinical trials provides a framework for clinical study planning to ensure alignment between study objectives, design, conduct, and analysis. The estimand or clinical question posed can be regarded as the backbone of the study and the clinical study protocol should reflect estimands accordingly. In practice, stakeholders are still learning how to embrace the estimand framework and how it impacts studies and study documents. In this paper, we anticipate that a protocol structure centred around estimands, or objectives rather than endpoints alone will prevail for all types of studies. To assist sponsors during this paradigm shift, this paper provides discussion and guidance for implementing the estimand framework in protocol templates.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalResearch DesignData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansProspective StudiesEstimandsICH E9(R1)ObjectivesProtocol structureProtocol templateProtocol writing

Identifiers

PMID35986349
PMCPMC9389514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.